Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So...am I wrong here?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 02:57 PM
Original message
So...am I wrong here?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=4454291&mesg_id=4454291


I don't believe this story, although the message resonates with me. Do you guys think this is true? Am I way off?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. I found it very moving but the minute I finished reading it I snopes'd it
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 03:11 PM by GreenJ
Didn't find anything but I'm pretty sure it's not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. I suppose it's possible they might gas animals
if the volume is high, funds are low, and it's cheaper. I've never heard of agencies doing that, but I'm also not an expert on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That part is definitely true. It happens in a number of states, North Carolina among them
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 03:19 PM by GreenJ
I just don't buy that this was actually written by an employee of one. The story is just too pat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Probably true
Effective, but you're right, it's probably glurge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Carbon monoxide is odorless.
Furthermore, CO euthanasia is rare, and never done with two or more species at the same time.

It's fake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't believe the letter is real but CO euthanasia in North Carolina is not rare
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 04:46 PM by GreenJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. While CO is odourless
It wouldn't surprise me if, when it's used for gassing, an odour is added for safety. You wouldn't want someone staying in a room with a high concentration of CO, so you want a way to alert them to its presence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's absolutely true
But only from an literary, existentialist perspective. Hemingway said, "I am a writer of fiction who tells the truth." Tim O'Brien, in his classic The Things They Carried says essentially that it is impossible to write a war story and tell the truth, but just because something didn't happen doesn't make it any less true.

Keats said that "'Beauty is truth, truth beauty.' That is all / Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know." And sometimes beauty is terrible and sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. I didn't buy it
Then I skimmed the thread, and was annoyed at the posters who repeatedly misinterpreted the objections. Why is it so hard to understand that "I don't think this was written by someone who really does that" is not the same as "I don't think animals are killed in this way, and anyway I don't care"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. CO euth is definitely done
It's cheap (a 65lb tank costs $14). There are many places across the US that still employ this method, though slowly but surely more humane methods are taking over. The problem is that it takes more training and more money to use the more humane methods, and some backwater dirt poor counties just lack the resources to be able to do it. The letter is most likely a load of hogwash, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sounds like glurge to me
The bit about "I tell them I know I'm going to Hell" put it over the top for me. Look, I've worked jobs I hated, but if they were compromising my immortal soul, I'd seek other employment.

Progressives should beware of the heart-rending apocryphal story, because it comes too close to a long-favored Republican tactic of "creating reality" to suit immediate needs. If this story is true as written, then that's terrific, but I don't believe it as is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. My bullshit detector started going off the charts as soon as I read it
And, FWIW, I read it before seeing this thread.

It was a moving piece, but after I finished reading it I couldn't help but feel like I'd been had. To me, the piece felt like propaganda - especially towards the end:

They are in heaven now, I tell myself. I then start cleaning up the mess, the mess, that YOU PEOPLE are creating by not spay or neutering your animals. The mess that YOU PEOPLE are creating by not demanding that a vet come in and do this humanely. You ARE THE TAXPAYERS, DEMAND that this practice STOP!


If old dude hates his job so much - which it sounds like it is pushing him right to the brink - then I cannot imagine why he wouldn't quit even if other work was difficult to find.

In addition, he talks about quite an attachment to these animals in a situation where he has to kill them. I have a pretty decent understanding of psychology, and that seems fishy to me. For instance, during WW2, soldiers on the front lines would tend to not make friends with new replacement soldiers in the unit because they figured they were just going to die (since they were so green). People shut down, emotionally, in situations like that because it is much easier to cope.

Also the constant refrains of "I'm going to hell" and "I'm a monster" seemed a bit much.

While none of those things in and of themselves lead to to believe we're being had, all taken together it leaves a real nasty taste in my mouth.

Just my .02.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. I know a cancer research assistant
in studies involving drugs crossing the blood/brain barrier whose job it was every morning to kill a feral cat for dissection.

He eventually had to quit because every tenth cat or so would cuddle up and purr. He just couldn't take it.

There are some jobs only psychopaths should do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. i wouldn't even think about taking that job
yeesh. necessary, i suppose, but not for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC