Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Amateur scientists scare me.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:35 AM
Original message
Amateur scientists scare me.....
While I applaud interest in science..this is going WAAAY too far

Do it yourself DNA:Amateurs Trying genetic engineering at home
SAN FRANCISCO — The Apple computer was invented in a garage. Same with the Google search engine. Now, tinkerers are working at home with the basic building blocks of life itself.

Using homemade lab equipment and the wealth of scientific knowledge available online, these hobbyists are trying to create new life forms through genetic engineering _ a field long dominated by Ph.D.s toiling in university and corporate laboratories.

In her San Francisco dining room lab, for example, 31-year-old computer programmer Meredith L. Patterson is trying to develop genetically altered yogurt bacteria that will glow green to signal the presence of melamine, the chemical that turned Chinese-made baby formula and pet food deadly.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/25/do-it-yourself-dna-amateu_n_153489.html

There are people in GD who actually think this is a good thing, because of course it takes it out of the hands of evil biotech!
Don't those freaks understand why this is done in contained labs!
I'm sorry this scares the shit out of me. In a lab under contained conditions bioengineering is great..but in amateur hands? :shudder:
:scared:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. How the hell could people afford to do it anyways?
PCR, cloning, etc aren't really cheap...gotta have the equipment, gotta have the chemicals, gotta have the knowledge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are making their own equipment
Which in itself scares me...How the hell could you know if the instrument is doing what its supposed to be doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. a high school class in this town does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. The 'amatuer'part doesn't worry me so much
But I agree with you on the labs and equipment aspect.
To easy to be this guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lizerdbits Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. What are the regulations involving GMOs?
All I know for certain about GMOs and regulations is if I ship one it has to be labeled as such, but I don't work with GMOs otherwise. I thought there were regulations for containment to make sure GMOs didn't get into the environment. At least until they had been approved (not sure if that's the FDA or what agency) if we're talking GMO crops.

"In Cambridge, Mass., a group called DIYbio is setting up a community lab where the public could use chemicals and lab equipment, including a used freezer, scored for free off Craigslist, that drops to 80 degrees below zero, the temperature needed to keep many kinds of bacteria alive."

That's not phrased very well. He means keeping them for long term storage, though you could keep them continuously growing instead (assuming it's an organism that doesn't genetically change much when grown ex vivo, but I think that more of a problem with some viruses grown in cell culture vs. a host).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. See thats what I wonder.
I thought that regs kept GMO type organisms under controlled conditons.
Could you imagine what could happen if some of the transgenic mice and such got out? Or plasmids?
I suppose people can use yeast and yogurt bacteria, but I can't understand how people could avoid contamination from said organisms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lizerdbits Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Looks like APHIS is involved for potential plant/animal pathogens
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/index.shtml

It probably depends on the organism though I'm not going to look into it right now. While that yogurt is pretty safe and would probably do nothing if spilled in your back yard, this could have serious consequences in the hands of the self professed 'biohackers.' Not just accidents but the more malicious types...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Here's the quote that alarms me...
"amateurs will probably pursue serious work such as new vaccines..." Holy fuck. Can you imagine these idiots trying to make a new vaccine in their garage or kitchen?!:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lizerdbits Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Good luck to them
Hiring some QA people to audit all their documentation and getting that through the FDA. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. OMG! WTF!? LOL I LOVVVVVVVVVVVVVE Dee-eye-why
OMG! I remember getting a microscope when I was like 5 and I was able to see the CELL WALLS of an ONION SKIN omg! I'm so scientific now because of that.!!! I'm practically a BIO-ENGENEERE!

Anyhoo, when I took BIOLOGY$$$$ in COLLEGE$$$$$$$$$ (what a GROSS abuse of POWER THAT CLASS WAS OMG! Totally PROFESSED by BIG PHARMA $HILL$$$$$$$) we got to extract DNA (not me using caps for EXCITEMENT, just using caps for ABREVIATIONS!) from the roots of GREEN ONION$. And then we put it in a little thing and I forgot the name but we did the DNA TYPING AND MATCHING OMG!

come to find out the green oiniononinon was the FATHER OF MY CHILD OMG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hey, don't knock it

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. I hope that does not extend to amatuer astronomers!
:evilgrin:

I don't do much actual science myself, but many supernovae and comet discoveries can be credited to amatuers. Likewise, the changes in luminosity of variable stars are tracked mostly by amatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Of course not!
Because their data can be verified and if wrong won't be accepted. It doesn't take special training to look through a telescope either.:)
I think amateur astronomers are pretty cool actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Unfortuately, in winter here it is either too cloudy or too cold to go observing.
Too bad too since it is nice to have it dark so early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. yes, amateurs cause so much harm when compared to the pros.
not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah
Like you amateurs know EVERYTHING that goes on in the professional world. NOT.
The woos don't even know how to read a scientific article.
Would you like to tell me since you know so much how a clinical trial works? And how long it takes a drug to go from development to market? Or what happens after it goes on the market? Or how the FDA works for that matter?
Come on smarty pants..You have ALL the answers right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. no, that esoteric information is only known to lab techs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. All you ever bring to a discussion is personal attacks.
How pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. i learned from the pros. like yourself.
didn't realize y'all had a whole forum of your own to practice in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. So that's it?
Your comeback is, "I know you are but what am I?"

I repeat - pathetic. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. didn't realize it was a contest. what's your prize?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC