Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GRRR!!! I hate reasonable DUers pushing fallacious arguments.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:26 PM
Original message
GRRR!!! I hate reasonable DUers pushing fallacious arguments.
Like the "if you support the war why don't you sign up?" talking point that ALWAYS pops up in some flame-fest involving Afghanistan. As if you are not allowed to have an opinion on foreign policy without being in the military. :eyes:

Another one I run into is when some religious person treats their so-called "mystical experience" as self-evident truth and is offended when they are told to be more skeptical of their own perceptions.

What other fallacious arguments do you see otherwise reasonable people make that drive you nuts?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. The old "well thats my experience" so it must be true for
everyone. Yes, I can understand if you had a been reaction to something (say a vaccine)you'd be wary but that doesn't necessarily mean that its a common experience at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ah, yes, the "my personal subjective experience is more important then facts" argument drives...
...me nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, I hate it when I tell people they're delusional or bonkers,
and they get offended. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Real Liberals don't behave that way.
If they were real liberals they would see that you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. ....
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm fine with that argument.
It illustrates the point that most who support the war in Afghanistan are cowards and hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm massively against the Afghan "war"
I'm hugely against the installation of criminal scum warlords into Afghan "government". I'm against ALL wars for empire but I don't think it makes sense to say "if you agree with it go fight there"

I would have supported the VC but I doubt I would have picked up arms for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. How does that follow?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Well, some home remedy or other worked for me as a child."
Or:

Blanket statements like: disease is from suggestion.

And this gem:

"your 'millions of examples,'were millions of people that were sick. I count that as one example. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. The false choice argument.
"Either we evolved from mud and ooze or someone Created us as complex beings."

Riiiight. Those are the only two choices? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. a related one: the false equivocation
2,000 physicists claim this. One TV repairman in Montana thinks this. We should consider these to be equally valid
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ah yes, the "both sides" nonsense that we got from FAUX News.
The conservative version of postmodernism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. honestly
it's liberal as well. Especially with medicine, or the environment, or anything related to liberal causes
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Oh absolutely.
Didn't mean to imply the left is immune. Gosh no, I put up with that crap on a daily basis over in the Health dungeon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. oh, yeah, i know
i think i have a bigger problem with it on the left; we're supposed to be the "smart" ones. The right are supposed to be the whackos :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yup! The rightwing did it on global climate change.
The majority of scientists agreed that there was anthropogenic climate change.

But rightwing apologists like the late Robin Cook, would get on TV and use his name and "scientific authority"
to claim that scientists disagreed and the jury was still out on this.

Bull- Ka! Ka!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. And evolution, of course
"Teach the controversy" is another "good" one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. One must be fair and balanced.
Teach intelligent design, after all nothing is better than a theory that has a foregone conlusion in it.

There is a creator, therefore, only a creator could create creation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. science is hard
thus=God

sorry, not God; a "creator"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. I'm a bit daft here...
but to me 'the late Robin Cook' means a British politician who resigned from the Cabinet in 2003 in protest against the decision to go to war in Iraq.

Was there also an American right-winger called Robin Cook?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. Maybe Robin Cook the author?...
the one who wrote Coma and Outbreak.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CanSocDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Some one or some thing....


...is out to get me. As if, their paranoia affects us all.


"...you are not allowed to have an opinion on foreign policy without being in the military."

You are not allowed to have an opinion on the laws of science...unless you believe in them.


.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. How it was in the good old days
Edited on Sun Apr-26-09 12:22 PM by JitterbugPerfume
believe me I was there and a lot of ways it was really crappy

especially the '50s and '80s
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I love the straw man agrument.
It sets a false premise only to disprove it. It's usually pretty obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Oh yeah, those good old days.
When everyone and their neighbor had measles, rubella, chicken pox, yellow fever, and they all got together for polio parties and no one THEY know of had any problems, at least compared to those DEADLY VACCINES we have today! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Longing for simpler times.
"The Spanish flu, also known as La Gripe Española, or La Pesadilla, was an unusually severe and deadly strain of avian influenza, a viral infectious disease, that killed some 50 million to 100 million people worldwide over about a year in 1918 and 1919. It is thought to have been one of the most deadly pandemics so far in human history."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_A_virus_subtype_H1N1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. they didn't take enough ginseng
they just didn't WANT to be healthy :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. They weren't getting those awful medications.
That save lives. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. maybe
BUT ONLY AT THE COST OF THEIR VERY SOULS
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
28. I hate...
reasonable or unreasonable DU-ers being prepared to quote and endorse right-wing people and sources and viewpoints if they share some of the same enemies.

E.g. Ron Paul, antiwar.com, even Pat Buchanan!

Perhaps one could call paleoconservativism a form of swine flu. If liberals/left-wingers let it mix its DNA with theirs, it can become much more dangerously infections!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. If you hate it then why don't you leave?
j/k :rofl: :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. Western medicine shows no improvement among people in the control group
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
32. Here's an example - in cartoon form!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC