It's just a hunch, but it seems we are an unsustainable species.
Again, just an opinion off the top of my furry little doggy noggin, but we seem to take out of the system more than we allow to replenish.
What is interesting, since this is a skeptics forum and we tend to look at topics that invite skepticism, is what need is being met by these alternative systems of spirituality and science.
I am again, speculating, or as we used to call it in the old days, just discussing things, but our main religions have left people with a sense of incompleteness and so alternative systems, like these theories about special human beings, or the other thread I just posted about the young disabled woman being tauted as:
"You are to teach the Universal and Spiritual Laws of Creator," say's that people are not only willing to admit that this particular individual is some present day version of someone's late grandmother, but that there is a Universal and Spiritual Law ( not sure which laws those are), a Creator ( OK common belief) and that this is just the person to teach just such laws as those, by just that Creator, just at this point in time. Obviously, the appearance of these very new belief systems suggest somethings, among them, that the "Big Three" religions and even the other established religions seem to leave unmet spiritual needs.
Then, on a scientific level, it suggests that for all of the amazing breakthroughs in science, people are still just as likely to believe in alternative forms of "cures". There have been some things about this that I have read that suggest that what is missing in modern medical encounters is exactly that "placebo" effect, that shaman-like confidence in what may appear to be a too clinical, harried, over worked health care professional.
On a cultural level, too, we live in uncertain times, people may have a base line sense of insecurity (loss of jobs, economy, war, the ones we know and discuss more on political terms) and on top of that, it may be easier to believe that eating frogs, because they live in a cool habitat may lower the body temperature (1) than to deal with a sudden new potential pandemic which may or may not be a false alarm.
Then, there is the over arching financial motive driving many of these so-called movements. True, traditional medicine is profit based, pretty much like everything else, but, it may seem cheaper and less stressful to believe your child who possibly has diagnosable ADD, does not need "those doctors" and those awful meds, when we can order an audio tape for $19.99 that helps us visualize aura's.
Still, less money spent on the wrong remedy, is still money lost. That, among other concerns, makes skeptics feel frustrated.
It was very painful debating with rightwing climate change deniers, in the past, on other forums, thinking and accepting that time was ticking, the planet was being damaged and in the highest levels of government for eight years, funds were being spent to disprove anthropogenic climate change and data in support of it was suppressed.
Things are moving so fast with the large human population, more mobile than ever, with information dispersed at the speed of an electron, with mankind's presence in almost every remote part of this planet, that, I wonder what good old terra firma will look like in 300 years?
I asked that question a few years ago, in casual conversation with about 15-20 adults, all serious people with grown families, all having seen the last 50-60 years of earth history first hand, and not one person thought, of this rather staid and traditional group of people, that mankind would be around.
I can see where skeptics feel frustrated, at the same time, I can also see where regular people are coming from, things are very confusing, very complex and pretty unstable in the world.
There! That should cheer you up! :hi:
References:
(1)
http://skepticblog.org/2008/11/09/tcm-ii/