Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dartmouth scientist says Oswald rifle photo real

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 08:43 PM
Original message
Dartmouth scientist says Oswald rifle photo real
Source: HOLLY RAMER, Associated Press Writer

CONCORD, N.H. – The infamous photograph of Lee Harvey Oswald holding a rifle in his backyard would have been nearly impossible to fake, according to a new analysis by a Dartmouth College professor.

Oswald, who was shot to death days after being charged with the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, claimed the photo of him holding a rifle in one hand and Marxist newspapers in the other had been doctored. Over the years, many others have pointed out what appear to be inconsistent lighting and shadows.

But Hany Farid, director of the Neukom Institute for Computational Science at Dartmouth, said the shadows are exactly where they should be.

"You can never really prove an image is real, but the evidence that people have pointed to that the photo is fake is incorrect," Farid said Thursday. "As an academic and a scientist, I don't like to say it's absolutely authentic ... but it's extremely unlikely to have been a fake."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091105/ap_on_re_us/us_oswald_photo

______________________________________________________________________

Sorry if this is the wrong forum for this...it doesn't fit in Sept/11 group...other than GD, I don't know where to post it; thought people here might be interested.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Huh
From what I remember, the shadows were secondary to the claims that he stood at an impossible angle and his head was the wrong size. Unfortunately, Farid didn't talk about those two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oswald was real....

But the limo and Kennedy were CGI fakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why would the article not show the photo in question?
Edited on Fri Nov-06-09 08:16 AM by Orrex
I hate when they do that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Those shadows may be real...
but tell me how he isn't falling over in that shot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. maybe he's on a hill
and they're just shooting him tilted, Battlefield Earth-style
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's likely on flat ground, but there's a visible slope on the edge of the property
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 12:32 PM by salvorhardin
It's not hard to see how this photo could have been taken from an odd angle. The property is small, and the person taking the photo could have been off to the side standing on the slight rise at the edge of the driveway.

Here's a link to the Google street view of the house at 2515 W 5th St., Irving, TX.: http://tr.im/EKN9



ETA: I had no idea the house was almost 12 miles from the Texas School Book Depository. Not that it's important, I just always envisioned it being much closer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Your usual sig line...
...makes a great caption for that picture. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC