Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roger Ebert on new agers and creationists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:09 AM
Original message
Roger Ebert on new agers and creationists
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 03:30 AM by salvorhardin
New Age beliefs are the Creationism of the Progressives. I move in circles where most people would find it absurd to believe that humans didn't evolve from prehistoric ancestors, yet many of these same people quite happily believe in astrology, psychics, reincarnation, the Tarot deck, the i Ching, and sooth-saying. Palmistry and phrenology have pretty much blown over.

If you were attending a dinner party of community leaders in Dallas, Atlanta, Omaha or Colorado Springs and the conversation turned to religion, a chill might fall on the room if you confessed yourself an atheist. Yet at a dinner party of the nicest and brightest in New York, Chicago, San Francisco and (especially) Los Angeles, if the hostess began to confide about past lives, her Sign and yours, and her healing crystals, it might not go over so well if you confessed you thought she was full of it.

New Age beliefs have largely stolen the stage from traditional religion in progressive circles. At dinner in my environs I rarely hear anyone share that they have been born again in Jesus. They may well have been, but they keep it to themselves.

They were raised to avoid religion and politics at dinner parties with strangers. Yet they assure everyone they are "a typical Gemini," were royalty in a previous lifetime, have a personal spirit guide, and have been told they will develop a serious disease but will recover from it. I rarely hear anyone share that they were a toilet cleaner in a previous lifetime and have a year to live at the most.
More: http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/12/new_agers_and_creationists_sho.html


On edit: X-Posted to GD. Not sure if it's OK to post a link (don't want it to seem like I"m rallying the troops). OTOH, if you look in my journal...
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, I WAS "a toilet cleaner in a previous lifetime"
but that was the 1970s and I needed the money.

Over here you're more likely to hear people saying they've cleaned toilets than talking about Jebus. I'm glad I live here.

I was also Shirley Maclaine in a past life.

Nice piece, would go down well in Health. And a couple of other places here where the whackjobs roam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I worry about him
Losing his voice has made his written output prodigious, and he's a startlingly good raconteur and an astute essayist. I hope he can hang on for a good long time, I'd miss him terribly if his illness took him out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. The reactions in GD are depressing but not unexpected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Actually, I'm rather heartened
I didn't expect to see so much defense of rationality.

Although the one UK resident who didn't know the NHS funded homeopathy was a bit of a jaw dropper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I had a run in with a poster on your GD thread
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 05:48 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
He accused me of being a hateful for combating falsehoods on vaccines (or was it the moon...I don't remember). I responded that telling someone they were wrong on facts was not hateful. I asked "If you asked someone what 5+7 was and they said "57" would telling them they were wrong be intolerant and hateful?" and said poster replied "I would say they were thinking creatively" or something to that effect.

I wish I had my favorite gif around back then:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It could have been worse
He could have said something about it being 57 in their reality. :)

That kind of talk doesn't seem to be quite so common nowadays, fortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I'd like to see what that person would think of such "creativity"...
...if they were in a store, buying two items priced $5 and $7, and a "creative" cashier rang up $57.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. let's go open a woo store
we can set the price at the register based on "spiritual value waves"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. With empty shelves
They can just "manifest" what they need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. At least with religious people it might be a habit left over from childhood
and you can give their general intelligence the benefit of the doubt.

There is no doubt when you're talking to a crystal person or a past lifer or any of the other flavors of new age woohead: you're talking to a fool.

I usually extricate myself from the interaction as quickly as possible because the next one who tells me I have a painful and occasionally fatal illness because I want to is going to be picking his front teeth out of his rectum and I'm not rich or well connected enough to get acquitted of the assault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Well.... if you would channel that negative energy against your illness.... /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC