Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elsewhere on DUer a poster called science a cult.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 03:12 PM
Original message
Elsewhere on DUer a poster called science a cult.
:banghead:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sadly, this is a widely held belief
Edited on Fri Jan-01-10 04:32 PM by salvorhardin
Usually it's not expressed with such extreme rhetoric but a lot of people truly believe that science is the same sort of animal as faith and religion. Sure, there are parallels to be drawn between scientific institutions and religious institutions and there are certain concepts in science that one has to accept without evidence such as the idea that our little corner of the universe operates the same way as every other place in the universe but it's a fundamental misreading of what both science and religion are all about. At its core, science is all about systematically controlling for human bias and failings to get the best possible understanding of the natural world as possible. Unlike religion, science has mechanisms built in for challenging claims and improving upon them. Another way in which science and religion differ is that over time scientific ideas converge whereas in religion, ideas multiply In science we end up with one consensus about say, the way gravity works, whereas in religion we have thousands of ideas about how god(s) created the world. And one thing that makes science distinctly un-cult like is that even the most high profile rock star scientist can be challenged by the least known grunt toiling away at the most obscure academic institution or business. Hell, even amateurs are capable of contributing to science, and have. For ten examples see: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/orchid/amateurs.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
skepticscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Posting on their computer
made possible by science, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. A few people were rude enough to point that out.
I didn't have the ambition. There's a level of idiocy so profound that it simply can't be addressed on a message board.

It was very plucky for other people to try, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Unfortunately, not such an uncommon attitude
This ranges from the old stereotype of the 'mad scientist' plotting to destroy the world to the 'post-modernist' view that science is just another belief system. I think I already mentioned my student who had previously studied the French philosophers and worshipped Derrida and Lacane. He liked to argue that 'science is just another religion' and that we were only teaching and doing research in Experimental Psychology because it was the 'Zeitgeist'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. This was special though. He also argued that "math" was a cult.
and "numbers" were a cult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I may have mentioned this before...
In my junior year of college I had an English course taught by a grad student with a major chubby for postmodernism. To demonstrate his point about the arbitrary nature of things (or whatever the hell he was demonstrating) he claimed that there is a tribe somewhere (the "other") for which two plus two does not equal four.

In essence, he was claiming that numbers are subjective.

He didn't name the tribe, nor did he care to discuss the implications of such a mathematical oddity; he was basically just fellating Foucault and taking us along for the ride.

Once he used the term "scientistic" to refer to the dogmatic, exclusionary nature of scientific progress, though he didn't use the word "cult" or "fundamentalist."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Wow, that guy is a walking PoMo stereotype!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. He was all about entrenched power structures etc.
I bumped into him a year or so after taking his class and I couldn't even talk to him.

I'd gone back to finish college after an absence of several years, so he and I were the same age. As such, I was better able to dismiss his bullshit as bullshit than I'd likely have been able to do during my earlier college years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Fortunately that BS bounces off of me quite nicely.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Have you ever had people tell you that 0 is not a number? Rather the absence of number?
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 04:11 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
Usually followed up by the line "The way black is the absence of color"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah, that's a good one.
I confess that I almost don't even know what to say to people like that, because I don't have the time, will, or resources to correct their deliberate failure to understand even basic concepts.

In the end, it gets down to them just being contrarian assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. The liberal arts majors and the science majors need to go to war with bottles and chains.
Edited on Sun Jan-03-10 09:40 AM by SemiCharmedQuark


It's not like we get all up in *their* shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yep, that was hysterically pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Gene Ray is posting on DU now? :O eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Your student liked to argue that science is "just another religion".
And your student worshipped Derrida. First, was your student an undergraduate? Had he actually read Derrida? Or, was he a typical undergraduate and possibly repeating things that he had misunderstood? Did he, or do you, connect the statement about science with something that Derrida wrote/said? If so, do you have a reference? I don't deny that Derrida could have said such a thing, but I really would like to see the context. I'm not sure what you are criticizing.

I have not read a lot of Derrida but what I have read of him, I find difficult. One of Derrida's contentions is that there is no canonical reading of a text; that may explain the complexity of his writing - he adds a lot of context - possibly as an attempt to restrain the interpretations of what he is saying. My personal experience of reading criticisms of Derrida is that many people criticize him for saying things that he has not said.

You talk about the 'postmodernist' view. Do you mean one particular postmodernist view out of the many that you can pick from? I'd be surprised if there is any particular view that all things labeled postmodernism would agree on.

I'm not clear on exactly what point your post is trying to make.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why does this surprise you??
There's a whole cabal of people who post in Health that think this. When I pointed out once that Gardasil was a very safe and effective vaccine I was accused of believing in "faith based science". Its always people who never have actually studied any science themselves, probably because its beyond their understanding
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I know it shouldn't, but it still does.
Maybe it's because I expect people to understand the notion of objective truth rather than spouting Postmodernist garbage. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. ...while typing on a modern computer.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. If it's the only way that that poster can relate to any belief system...
...science and cults may not be easily distinguishable. If he gets his religion and his science handed down to him from on high, yeah, I could see where he's coming from.

He probably wouldn't call his religion a cult, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC