Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pseudo-Linguistic Woo: "Edenics"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 10:53 PM
Original message
Pseudo-Linguistic Woo: "Edenics"
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was not impressed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. jeebus
most linguists believe in a "proto-earth?" Yeah, because Hebrew, Japanese, and Mayan are bascially the same goddamn language :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Its intelligent design for word loving woos.
Incredibly stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, even linguists have their fringe of woobaggers
Those guys also cross over into archaeology when they start interpreting plow scars on rocks as examples of the Celtic Ogham script, for example.

Check out a book called America BC by Barry Fell for a full blast of insanity on that front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Still funny, but less nuts then these guys, are the "Nostraticists".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic_languages

Their claim, that several of the language families of Eurasia are related to each other, is perfectly valid, IMO. There is lots of strange similarities in pronouns and verb endings among several of the language families of Northern Eurasia, the most obvious being a 1st Person pronoun with M and a 2nd Person pronoun with T (me/thou). The problem is that their reconstructions really suck and are full of handwavium. Another problem is that they try to include the Afro-Asiatic languages (Semitic, Egyptian, Somali, etc) in Nostratic, which I think is a mistake caused by a large number of Proto-Semitic loans into Proto-Indo-European.

I propose a smaller super-family I call "Mitian", named after the M-T pronouns. It includes Indo-European, Uralic, Etruscan, Georgian, Altaic, Chukchi-Kamchatkan, and Eskimo-Aleut. Mitian then may be a part of a slightly larger grouping that includes Dravidian (Tamil, etc.), Korean, Japanese, and a couple of Amerindian language families
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I wonder
do they try to include Finno-Ugric languages as well? Because those are most definitely from East Asia, from what I understand
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Finno-Ugric is a sub-family of Uralic
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 09:42 PM by Odin2005
And Proto-Uralic was probably spoken in western Siberia, where the deepest branches of the family are.

Uralic may have a close relationship with the Chukchi-Kamchatkan languages of far NE Siberia as well as the Eskimo-Aleut languages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. well
I believe that the Finno-Ugric tribes settled in the urals for a while, so that makes sense

I'm just wondering whether these guys consider these languages to be part of their grand hypothesis
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Words fail me...
must be a glitch in my original programming.

"These proto-Semitic or early Biblical Hebrew words were programmed into our common ancestors, Adam and Eve, before the language dispersion, or babble at the Tower of Babel...blah blah argle bargle..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. It almost makes sense. A little bit of knowledge...
It's like a conspiracy-minded stoner took an undergrad course in the history of the English language and just started gluing shit together with other stuff she found on Google.there are hints in there that the original author has at least a cursory knowledge with actual things - Proto Indo European, for instance, and Chomsky's Nobel-winning work on language "hardwiring" - but other than the names for things and maybe having misunderstood some wiki entries, these people are total morans. Just when I think the stupid has been exhausted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-10 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Unbelievable
One aspect that I find amazing is the implication that the Hebrew *writing system* is also determined by God. 'Children naturally read from right to left', states 'Hebrew Scholar'. No, children don't *naturally* read at all. Unlike spoken language, reading and writing are not universals, and are highly culture-dependent, and relatively recent in origin. And how, according to such a theory, do you explain Egyptian hieroglyphics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Or Arabic. Or Hebrew. Or Chinese, Japanese, etc.
Some languages are even written top to bottom, and still manage to be read and written.

A "Hebrew Scholar" said that? HEBREW scholar?

:wow:

He must not have been scholaring the language very long. With that comment, I suspect he's a student at Jim Bob's Fire-Baptized Seminary and Bait Store in Flaming Cross, Mississippi.

He needs to take lessons from Rabbi Kinky Friedman...

Well, I walked on into my House o' God
The congregation was on the nod,
Just the Chosen Folks doing their weekly thing.
Hear, O Israel! Yes indeed,
My book was backwards, I couldn't read,
But I got a good rise when I heard that Rabbi sing,
'Baruch atoh Adonoi,
What the hell you doing back there, boy?"

We reserve the right to refuse services to you,
Your friends are all on welfare
You call yourself a Jew?
You need your ticket and your tie,
To zip your prayers on through,
We reserve the right to refuse services...unto you.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh dear god.
There really is no hope, you know.

Maybe a thousand years from now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's not a very cunning linguist. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC