Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our next Monarch on the Enlightenment (he seems to be against it...)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 10:10 AM
Original message
Our next Monarch on the Enlightenment (he seems to be against it...)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1248347/Prince-Charles-unbelievable-abuse-faces-views.html

This was a few months ago, but I only just came across it. Fortunately, our royals have no real power these days. But what an embarrassment to the nation he is/will be.

Incidentally, I managed at first to read 'bullish speech' as 'bullshit speech'. My misreading was doubtless closer to the truth than the real version!
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Charles is an embarassment to thew UK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. The guy is a complete waste of oxygen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. He mentioned one testable hypothesis in that speech...
Edited on Sun Oct-10-10 10:56 AM by onager
He also said, as he has done previously in the past, that he hoped his efforts would be appreciated after he was dead.

No problem, Charlie. Just as we humbly appreciate the approach to world peace pursued by your ancestor, Kaiser Wilhelm II.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Kaiser Whilhelm II
is not an ancestor to Charles. Just thought you'd like to know.

Wilhelm was a grandson of Queen Victoria. Charles is a great-great-great grandson. They are distant uncle and nephew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks! Should have said "distant relative."
I was thinking of that rare flash of humor from Kaiser Wilhelm in 1914. When he said he would be attending a Shakespeare play - "The Merry Wives of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Charles is very supportive of
environmental issues. The quotes given in the article are misleading.

My marine biologist brother-in-law, Gregory Stone, thinks highly of Charles and his support of ecological programs.

Video:

http://suprememastertv.com/sos-global-warming/The-oceans-are-central-to-our-livelihoods-and-our-survival-on-the-planet.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He is pro-environment, which is a good thing....
however, he is also pro-homeopathy, suspicious of modern science and the modern world generally, and a bit of an all-round idiot.

While the particular article was in a nasty tabloid, it was quoting him approvingly here; and he's said similar things elsewhere.

He is a lot less dangerous than that other upper-class twit in a high place, David Cameron; but he is still an embarrassment in most respects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. He sounds perfect to me
because if there's one thing we in the workaday classes enjoy, it's looking down our more practical noses at the average upper class twit.

I always thought of him as decent, dim and deluded.

He's in no position to do any damage, just a celebrity by birth.

Don't be too embarrassed by him. After all, he's no George W. Stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. That apple didn't fall far from the tree...
Some quotes from his dad, Prince Philip:

"I don't think a prostitute is more moral than a wife, but they are doing the same thing."

"When a man opens the car door for his wife, it's either a new car or a new wife."


During a state visit to China in 1986, he famously told a group of British students: "If you stay here much longer, you'll all be slitty-eyed".

To a driving instructor in Oban, Scotland: "How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to get them through the test?"

"British women can't cook."

"Everybody was saying we must have more leisure. Now they are complaining they are unemployed."
(during the 1981 recession)

"You are a woman, aren't you?" (in 1984, in Kenya, to a native woman who had presented him with a small gift)

"Oh no, I might catch some ghastly disease." (in 1992 in Australia, when asked to stroke a Koala bear)

"You managed not to get eaten, then?" (in 1998, to a student who had been trekking in Papua New Guinea)

"Do you know they have eating dogs for the anorexic now?" (speaking to Susan Edwards, who is blind, wheelchair bound and has a guide dog)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC