Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else notice that a lot of "feministic" postmodern/new age woo sounds pretty sexist itself?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:09 PM
Original message
Anyone else notice that a lot of "feministic" postmodern/new age woo sounds pretty sexist itself?
Edited on Tue Nov-16-10 11:10 PM by Odin2005
I see this crap a lot from the PoMo nutty types, taking cross-cultural "archetypal" sexist stereotypes about women and men (man = active, woman = passive; man = modern civilization, woman - nature; man = logic, woman = intuition; etc.) and just giving them a positive spin. Then of course there are the nonsense screeds, like one certain DUer posts constantly, equating environmental destruction and a "patriarchal tendency to domination over nature" and similar travesties of reason. I think it is pretty pathetic and actually insulting to women.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. that's an excellent point
I hadn't really thought about it, but that's true. How often do you hear, "if women were in charge, there wouldn't be any war, since women are naturally peaceful" or something like that. Very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "Women are naturally peaceful" tell that to Maggie Thatcher, LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Women are naturally empathetic and nurturing, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Postmodernism of any stripe is full of shit.
One of its favorite bullshit pastimes is the creation of paired lists of artificial opposites and then assigning the less cool list to whatever aesthetic or cultural concept is currently being assailed.

Sure, the occasional nugget of useful insight can be wrung out of this intellectual dead-end of a philosophical system, but mostly it's just a succession of rhetorical card tricks.


Incidentally, a PoMo zealot's typical response to the above criticism is either "you don't get it" or "your objection only proves that it's correct."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or something like "you are trapped in the metanarrative" or similar shit.
And WTF is with PoMos being so enamored of Psychoanalysis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. That's going to be my theme for next week.
Postmodernism of any stripe is full of shit.

If I made Fortune Cookies, I'd put that in one. It kicks metaphorical ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I confess that I didn't realize until afterward that I'd invoked "shit stripe"
Serendipity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jmaxfie1 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-11 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Agreed, PoMo sucks
Other than hipsters, old New Left professors and first year college kids I don't think anyone takes Postmodernist philosophy all that seriously anymore, Thank God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, it's the same old sexist garbage
dressed up in robes and garlands instead of the three piece power suit or the priestly drag.

However, patriarchy has damaged us and everything around us horribly. Chances are matriarchy wouldn't be any better.

Equality would be a nice change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yep! Hear hear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Agreed
As I posted a few months ago, "Some of the most fundamentally sexist people are those who flatter women the most - providing flattery as a substitute for equal rights". The old-fashioned version of this - women are too gentle and beautiful to risk being corrupted by masculine activities like going to university or voting - is sometimes reflected uncomfortably in passages, like the one that I was then replying to, which stated that society emphasizes masculine values of survival and achievement over 'The Feminine' with its emphasis on 'beauty, graciousness, compassion and relatedness'.


'The role of a woman is to nourish, uphold and sustain. To Nourish, Uphold and Sustain' (Particularly old-fashioned teacher at English girls' school, attended by LB, c. 1976.)

'Ugh!' (LB, then and now.)

And these sentimental passages are saying pretty much the same thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I've always thought that those who try to put women
on a pedestal as the "better sex" are in some ways treated us with a certain condencesion...You know..."women's ears are too delicate for curse words" kinda thing. True feminists don't want to be treated either worse OR BETTER then men, we just want to be treated the same as men..or better yet...as individuals.
Oh yeah, and alot of that POMO matriarchy shit plays into stereotype of how women are perceived to be. A positive stereotype is STILL a stereotype.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. right
"Asians are good at math" and "Jews are good with money" are (I guess) positive stereotypes, but making those stereotypes is equally as ignorant as the negative ones
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I took a sociology class a few years ago. We talked about the "Perfect Stereotype"
Asians are good at math--yes, it's a "positive" thing to say, but still a stereotype. What about Asians that aren't good at math? Or Jews that can't keep their checkbook straight. God, what was the name of the term they used..Oh! Model Minority. That just because a stereotype makes reference to positive attributes rather than negative ones, it's still a bad thing, and a stereotype just as much as "Asians are shitty drivers" and "Jews control the world"

I had never thought about it until I took the class but it makes sense, that you can't group people together for good or bad reasons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_minority
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. BINGO!!! I knew there had to be a term for that crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lizerdbits Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Shit like chivalry
Usually means the women is getting treated much worse in private, at least in my experience and the experience of women I've known. It also distracts from the lack of rights. If you keep telling her she's pretty and how important it is that she 'nourish, uphold and sustain' or other shit like that, she'll forget all about not being allowed to be educated and having few options in life other than marriage and children.

I knew as a teenager I didn't want to have kids. I honestly don't have a child nurturing bone in my body. Interestingly the last guy I briefly dated once said 'you're so logical about everything and that's what so irritating about you'. LOL! If you were using stereotypes, he would have been the emotional female and I would have been the logical male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. I like resurrected threads! And what about these "archetypes..."
Hey, just popping in to thread-jack as usual.

Speaking of those archetypes...I just found a French website with a thread full of fascinating pix.

All the photos show women in WWII, from all nations (including Japan, Yugoslavia, Nazi Germany, etc.). Many of the photos are color (or colorized). As a history geek, I just wasted some time there (and I'll probably post this over in GD to bore other people too!):

http://atlantikwall.superforum.fr/t7183-femmes-en-guerre

Some examples:

A Polish nurse, captured by the Germans after the fall of Warsaw in September 1939, fate unknown but almost certainly grim:



Russian bomber pilot Mariya Dolina:



And finally an American archetype of the era, "Rosie The Riveter:"





Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Russian women kicked ass in WWII
as they did in many nations, but in Russia they were very often combat soldiers. Snipers, pilots, etc. There was one regiment, the 46th Taman Guards Night Bomber Aviation Regiment, which was one of the best in the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The "Night Witches!" Thanks for the mention!
Those women were really incredible. Flying an obsolete biplane designed as a crop duster, usually cutting off the engine and gliding onto the target silently. At night. In sub-zero temps. From an open cockpit. Yeesh!

One thing that sometimes saved them: they were very hard to shoot down, because the top speed of that biplane was lower than the stall speed of a German fighter plane.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Russian pilots in general were badass
I've read of multiple instances where the russian pilot would actually ram the german aircraft when they ran out of ammunition
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC