Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you like to give your opinion about Clinical Trials?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 05:10 PM
Original message
Would you like to give your opinion about Clinical Trials?
This is a completely anonymous survey about participation in clinical trials done by a researcher who is also a dear friend. No personal information is requested or tracked in any way. There's a space for comments at the end. Thanks!

https://redcapsurvey.stanford.edu/surveys/index.php?hash=5b8add2a5d98b1a652ea7fd72d942dac%22%3EClick+here+to+take+the+survey%3C%2Fa%3E
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Done
Though I'm far far far from a typical respondent, being someone who works on clinical trial data daily...:rofl: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you for your awesomeness
I responded too, and I'm her friend! It really is just looking for opinions - doesn't matter who you are or what you do, your opinion is very much wanted! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rexcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. I completed the survey...
I monitor clinical trials for the Pharma companies, mostly oncology trials with some endocrinology thrown in for fun. I guess that makes me one of the evil ones here at DU.

Several years ago I was given an investigation al product (IP) that was in clinical trials for re-labeling but I did not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria but my orthopedic doc was the lead PI. My health insurance company would not have paid for the injections because it was off label so the company approved a "compassionate use" for me and I received the IP (already FDA approved for other indication) which saved me about $5,000. The IP delayed by shoulder replacement surgery (age related issue) which was the goal at the time. Go figure that a pharma company has any compassion. Of course I see compassion a lot with the pharma companies but that would be heresy for some on DU.

I do believe the some of the pharma companies have some ethical issues but they are not totally evil. There is some good in the industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I've said this before I think
But the most callous, unethical people I ever met in my 15 years of work were in ACADEMIA/GOVT (NIH) not the private Pharmaceutical industry. Not that there weren't really wonderful people at NIH, because there were but this Pharmas are all evil unethical people is a total crock of shit. I would say the corporate/marketing people are closer to that stereotype but even there almost everyone I know actually cares about helping people. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Almost no one goes into this bitch of an career for the money. Its too difficult.
Even some of the not so nice places I've worked have managed to put out good product even if they treated their employees like shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rexcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I had a clinical site at the NIH...
for a Pharma study. It was one of the worst sites I have ever been to, even worse than MD Anderson in Houston, TX and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center in Columbus, Ohio. The protocol was a guideline to the staff at the NIH despite the Principal Investigator signing the Form FDA 1572. There were subjects on the study who were also participating in other studies which was a protocol violation (inclusion/exclusion criteria). The NIH Principal Investigator I was working with didn't care nor did his staff. I have never monitored a trial at NIH since and that goes for MD Anderson and OSU Cancer Center.

Of the three site I have listed OSU is the worst. I would not send a dead rat there for treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Done. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC