Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anybody else seen "Dark Matters - Twisted But True?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 01:36 AM
Original message
Anybody else seen "Dark Matters - Twisted But True?"
W-e-e-l-l-l...kinda/sorta true, anyway.

New show on the Science Channel. I caught an episode last night, with 3 segments:

"Einstein's Brain" - true story of the guy who stole Einstein's brain, then lugged it around the USA for several decades. Funniest line: "One of the smartest brains in history, stolen by one of the dumbest."

"Unidentified Flying Nazis" - umpteenth TV re-hash of the alleged Nazi anti-gravity device, "The Bell," and its crash in Pennsylvania in the 1950's. Weird omission - not a single mention of the runic symbols supposedly painted on the whozis, that gave it Occult Powers.

"Killer Thoughts" - not again! Mega-umpteenth rehash of the tired old "Operation Stargate" claptrap, with the remote viewers who saw "secret underground NSA facilities!" Would the NSA really admit that to these kooks? At least, near the end, they had a working stage magician demonstrate how to fake psychokinesis.

Usual Tedious Personal Rant, re Operation Stargate - Long ago on a slow day in Dzerzhinsky Square, a couple of KGB agents were poring over the latest polling data from the USA.

"Stalin on a trailer hitch, Boris! Have you SEEN this stuff? Look at the percentage of those idiots who believe in a personal god. And angels! And demons! And past-life regression! And..."

"And Uri Geller, and psychic powers and...damn, Svetlana! I'll bet we could convince the stupid Americans we're actually wasting money on this nonsense. And they would have to set up their own psychic research project, to counter-spend us."

"Nah, Boris. Not even the Americans could be that stupid..."
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was flipping around and trying to find something diverting
and lingered on that just long enough to feel brain cells turning to mush.

I'm glad there was eventually some unconscious humor in it. I didn't want to risk addling wits I don't have so I just shut the tube off instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't mind fanciful stories, but these were just boring. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. The commercials represented it in a way that sounded
skeptical and interesting, so we set the DVR to record the series. The very first segment of the first ep we saw was awful claptrap about The Philadelphia Experiment. Never canceled a series so fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks, all. I won't be watching anymore either...
Edited on Sun Sep-11-11 11:24 AM by onager
Well, maybe for some unintentional humor. That ape-man army commercial does look sort of interesting...:evilgrin:

Oh, whenever one of those People Stumbling Down Unique Paths brags that "the govt. spent $20 million studying psychic phenomena, so it must be real!11!" Just remind them that Operation Stargate spent $20 million over 20 years. About $1 million a year, or probably less than the annual CIA budget for paper clips.

The Wikipedia article on Stargate is hilarious. Almost every "reference" is a book penned by one of the relentlessly self-promoting Stargate "psychics" - mostly Joe McGoneagle and Paul Smith. (Or one of their partners in crime, like Russell Targ.)

Which leads to...whoops!

"Reading the Enemy's Mind" is filed under GENERAL FICTION on the parent publisher's (MacMillan's) site<1>. Since when is it okay to cite science fiction as sources to explain real events? In short, why is this nonsense in Wikipedia? Jeremystalked talk 12:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Stargate_Project

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC