http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/17/AR2005111701877.htmlMedicaid's Fragile Beneficiaries
As Congress Considers Budget Cuts, Services to Area's Disabled at Risk
By Mary Otto
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 18, 2005; Page B01
<snip>
On Capitol Hill, the debate over cutting the nation's social programs is framed in sums so vast as to become abstract. But barely two miles away, within the small, bright, preschool classrooms of the Easter Seals Child Development Center, there is no dispute about the usefulness of every federal dollar.
For this is where George Essel, 3, who could not walk eight months ago, now bustles about, helping his classmates with a simple science experiment. And this is where Cailin Meja-Santos, also 3, paralyzed from the waist down, eagerly explores the hallways wearing her new leg braces. These children and nearly every other child at the center are beneficiaries of Medicaid, the nation's $330 billion health care program for the poor and disabled. And Medicaid has become a prime target as Congress develops a broad fiscal plan to trim the federal deficit over the next five years.
Republican leaders in the House were pushing again late last night to find the votes for a $50 billion package of budget reductions that would slash spending on a wide variety of programs, among them food stamps, college loans, child support enforcement, farm aid and the enormous Medicaid program, which serves 53 million people -- about half of them children. Any cuts would need approval from House and Senate negotiators.
According to an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, about $30 billion of the savings would be realized through reductions in benefits and increased cost sharing, said Leighton Ku, a senior fellow. Other analysts have predicted that the changes imposed upon the working poor could drive millions of families out of the Medicaid system entirely.<snip>
The rest of the article goes on to describe the Republican justifications for the proposed cuts and Democrats' concerns about the effect of the proposed cuts on the disabled, families, and children.