Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Slate editorial on Schiavo case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Disability Donate to DU
 
pop goes the weasel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 10:07 AM
Original message
Slate editorial on Schiavo case
This article does a good job of distilling the disability rights argument:

http://www.slate.com/id/2115208/">Why Congress was right to stick up for Terri Schiavo.
By Harriet McBryde Johnson
Posted Wednesday, March 23, 2005, at 4:50 AM PT

The Terri Schiavo case is hard to write about, hard to think about. Those films are hard to look at. I see that face, maybe smiling, maybe not, and I am reminded of a young woman I knew as a child, lying on a couch, brain-damaged, apparently unresponsive, and deeply beloved—freakishly perhaps but genuinely so—living proof of one family's no-matter-what commitment. I watch nourishment flowing into a slim tube that runs through a neat, round, surgically created orifice in Ms. Schiavo's abdomen, and I'm almost envious. What effortless intake! Due to a congenital neuromuscular disease, I am having trouble swallowing, and it's a constant struggle to get by mouth the calories my skinny body needs. For whatever reason, I'm still trying, but I know a tube is in my future. So, possibly, is speechlessness. That's a scary thought. If I couldn't speak for myself, would I want to die? If I become uncommunicative, a passive object of other people's care, should I hope my brain goes soft and leaves me in peace?

<snip>

http://www.slate.com/id/2115208/
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, Another One...
bites the dust! The fact that SLATE now appears to have joined the other MSM is extremely disappointing to me. Why should I be surprised, I haven't been able to figure out the "hows & whys" of what has happened to MSM.

I didn't think it was possible for this administration to get to all of the, but something is going on and I smell just one more RAT!!

We've got to keep the pressure on, and we need to be sure and send a message to our representatives. What are they so afraid of??

I have a Labrador Retriever who is still a puppy who has yet to "roll-over" as well as our Democratic Leaders! Others have argued it's better to keep the Democrats we have now and hope things will change, but I'm increasingly becoming more disenfranchised. Bill Nelson does NOTHING for me and I don't think I can support his re-election. In fact, I told him in a several letters just how I feel! Got the usual auto-response and am looking for a replacement that I can support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Banazir Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was hoping she'd give her input on this.
She did a great article about Peter Singer awhile back, too. I was actually searching around last night to see if she'd said anything about this, but couldn't find anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. If anything good comes out of this whole O.J.-like mess..
getting Harriet McBryde Johnson a voice in what is at least the fringes of the MSM might be it. (Then again, she has been in the New York Times...) She's one of the few people with a disability writing about disability issues anywhere outside our own publications (Ragged Edge, Mouth, etc.) Everyone should read her pieces on the Jerry Lewis telethon (she finds it insulting and demeaning) before Labor Day comes around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. 4 best points:
1. Ms. Schiavo is not terminally ill. She has lived in her current condition for 15 years. This is not about end-of-life decision-making. The question is whether she should be killed by starvation and dehydration.

2. Ms. Schiavo is not dependent on life support. Her lungs, kidneys, heart, and digestive systems work fine. Just as she uses a wheelchair for mobility, she uses a tube for eating and drinking. Feeding Ms. Schiavo is not difficult, painful, or in any way heroic. Feeding tubes are a very simple piece of adaptive equipment, and the fact that Ms. Schiavo eats through a tube should have nothing to do with whether she should live or die.

3. This is not a case about a patient's right to refuse treatment. I don't see eating and drinking as "treatment," but even if they are, everyone agrees that Ms. Schiavo is presently incapable of articulating a decision to refuse treatment. The question is who should make the decision for her, and whether that substitute decision-maker should be authorized to kill her by starvation and dehydration.

~snip

9. The whole society has a stake in making sure state courts are not tainted by prejudices, myths, and unfounded fears—like the unthinking horror in mainstream society that transforms feeding tubes into fetish objects, emblematic of broader, deeper fears of disability that sometimes slide from fear to disgust and from disgust to hatred. While we should not assume that disability prejudice tainted the Florida courts, we cannot reasonably assume that it did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Disability Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC