Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Red States Swing with Edwards.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Elizabeth Edwards Supporters Group Donate to DU
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 04:10 PM
Original message
Red States Swing with Edwards.
Edited on Wed Apr-25-07 04:11 PM by IndyOp
An intriguing post on the Edwards' Campaign Blog from sirius...

Red States Swing with Edwards.

....Edwards also outraised both Clinton and Obama in the "red" states. (Here I'm defining red states as the 31 states whose electoral votes went to Bush in the 2004 election.)

I figured this out after I saw a state-by-state breakdown of first-quarter campaign receipts posted on the USA Today web site. It looked to me like Edwards' numbers in the "red" states were very high. I wanted to confirm it, so I did the math.

Here are the totals from "red" states:

Edwards: $5,968,936 (or about 43% of his total)
Clinton: $5,698,201 (or about 22% of her total)
Obama: $4,989,496 (or about 19% of his total)

<snip>

Although Clinton and Obama outraised Edwards overall, they each raised only about one fifth of their totals from the 31 "red" states (three fifths of the number of states). Edwards raised more than two fifths of his total, or a bit less than half, from the same 31 states.

<snip>

Those are a lot of numbers, but what do they mean? It seems to me that they mean that Edwards' message appeals to people across the political spectrum, and that he is the best Democratic candidate to compete in all 50 states. If you like Howard Dean's 50 State Strategy, in other words, you'll love Edwards.

There are a lot of reasons for this.

A Democrat without a Southern accent has not won the presidency since 1960. It's possible the dynamics that have caused this 47 year trend have changed in the past 2 years due to the extraordinarily weak performance of the Bush administration, but it's likely they haven't.

Edwards is also courting rural voters. His rural recovery agenda is addressing the concerns of rural voters that have not been addressed by the other candidates.

Edwards' widespread appeal is interesting, because most people watching the race consider him to be the most progressive of the major Democratic candidates. It seems counterintuitive, then, that he would also have the most appeal in "red" states. The secret seems to lie in his values, his honesty, and his populism, not to mention his accent.

As others have noted, because of Edwards' crossover appeal, this time around, the most progressive candidate may also be the most electable candidate.

I think all of this should be a source of pride to Democratic voters in the "red" states. From Alaska to Texas, and from Nevada to South Carolina, Edwards is the candidate who can make the case for the Democratic Party. As chuckles1 pointed out, in 2008, North Carolina may just be the swingiest of swing states. Native son John Edwards will help turn it blue. In fact, with Edwards as the nominee, we Democrats may as well consider all of the red states fair game.



Perhaps this reveals a bit about Edwards' campaign strategy - go for the Red states and, with sufficient momentum there, the Blue States will catch on?

On Edit - LINK! http://blog.johnedwards.com/story/2007/4/24/151722/268

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Sure Hope So
I mean, it would be great if we could turn red states blue, and I just don't see any of the other candidates doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 23rd 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Elizabeth Edwards Supporters Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC