Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hollywood’s Whiteout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Race & Ethnicity » African-American Issues Group Donate to DU
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 10:23 AM
Original message
Hollywood’s Whiteout
CRAMMED into this year’s field of 10 best picture Oscar nominees are British aristocrats, Volvo-driving Los Angeles lesbians, a flock of swans, a gaggle of Harvard computer geeks, clans of Massachusetts fighters and Missouri meth dealers, as well as 19th-century bounty hunters, dream detectives and animated toys. It’s a fairly diverse selection in terms of genre, topic, sensibility, style and ambition. But it’s also more racially homogenous — more white — than the 10 films that were up for best picture in 1940, when Hattie McDaniel became the first black American to win an Oscar for her role as Mammy in “Gone With the Wind.” In view of recent history the whiteness of the 2011 Academy Awards is a little blinding.

Nine years ago, when Denzel Washington and Halle Berry won his and her Oscars — he was only the second African-American man to win best actor, and she was the first African-American woman to win best actress — each took a moment to look back at the performers from earlier generations who had struggled against prejudice and fought to claim the recognition too often denied them.

“This moment is so much bigger than me,” Ms. Berry said, before convulsing with sobs. “This moment is for Dorothy Dandridge, Lena Horne, Diahann Carroll.” When Mr. Washington took the stage, he praised God and then recognized another higher power, Sidney Poitier, who received an honorary Academy Award earlier that evening for helping to dismantle the color line in film.” “I’ll always be chasing you, Sidney,” Mr. Washington said, holding his Oscar toward Mr. Poitier, who had won his own best actor prize in 1964 for “The Lilies of the Field.” “I’ll always be following in your footsteps.”

Real change seemed to have come to movies or at least the Academy, which had given statuettes to a total of seven black actors in the previous 73 years. After Mr. Washington and Ms. Berry, there would be Jamie Foxx and Forest Whitaker (both best actors); Morgan Freeman (best supporting actor); Jennifer Hudson and Mo’Nique (best supporting actresses). The consolidation of a black presence in the movies and television did not signal the arrival of a postracial Hollywood any more than the election of Barack Obama in 2008 spelled the end of America’s 400-year-old racial drama. But it was possible, over much of the past decade, to believe that a few of the old demons of suspicion and exclusion might finally be laid to rest.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/movies/awardsseason/13movies.html

Whoopi Goldberg gets miffed at not being mentioned, and the Times responds:

http://watching-tv.ew.com/2011/02/14/whoopi-goldberg-criticizes-new-york-times-for-not-mentioning-her-oscar-hasselbeck-cancels-subscription-in-protest/
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn Whoopi.
Edited on Wed Feb-16-11 05:18 PM by Number23
I love her but, damn.

Edit: And if Hasselback ever had a subscription to the NYTimes, I'll eat my shoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. IMO, Whoopi has a valid complaint
she is only one of two black woman Oscar winners until 2001. For the Times to leave out that fact is uncharacteristic of their normally excellent work and an example of the lack of detail when the mainstream (white) media deals with black people's issues. I saw the NY Times response, which is the usual "sorry we got caught" mealy-mouthed statement. She's only one of two, why couldn't they have named them? :shrug:

This also an example of the "whiteout", i.e., the usual ignoring of black people and their accomplishments, in both Hollywood and newsmedia. When there are only 2 black winners, and they could name them both--and then don't.



P.S. if Elizabeth Hasselbeck actually had a subscription to the NY Times, I'd be shocked. That's a waste of good paper for someone that doesn't read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Race & Ethnicity » African-American Issues Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC