Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Marine Corps Times) Editorial: M4 partnership needed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 06:50 AM
Original message
(Marine Corps Times) Editorial: M4 partnership needed
M4 partnership needed

The Corps has so far steered clear of the ongoing debate over replacing the M4 carbine.

Battle-tested and in universal use across the services, the Colt-designed M4 is familiar to virtually every soldier, sailor, Marine and airman.

Replacing the weapon would require the services to clear training and logistical hurdles and spend millions of dollars. But that pales in comparison to what is spent on a single jet fighter, and the result — a more reliable, more effective weapon — will have a direct impact on battle performance.

In a dust test conducted last year by Army weapons experts, the M4 finished dead last. It jammed nearly four times more often than its nearest rival, the Heckler & Koch 416: Out of 60,000 rounds fired, the M4 experienced 882 stoppages compared to 233 for the 416. Those results could prove catastrophic in close-quarters battle, where spending a few seconds to clear a jam could cost a Marine his life.

This wasn’t news to Army Special Forces units, which dropped the M4 in favor of FNH USA’s Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle specifically because of concerns about the M4’s reliability.


Rest of article at: http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/community/opinion/marine_editorial_m4_121508/%2e
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC