Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GAO denies protest of Army JLTV award

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 06:26 AM
Original message
GAO denies protest of Army JLTV award
GAO denies protest of Army JLTV award
By Kris Osborn - Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday Feb 17, 2009 21:17:02 EST

The Government Accountability Office on Tuesday denied a protest — filed by Northrop Grumman-Oshkosh and Textron-Boeing-SAIC — of the Army’s Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) contract award decision, GAO officials said.

The GAO’s report is complete but being held under protective order for the time being, a procurement official with the agency said.

In October, the Army awarded three $60 million technology development deals to a BAE Systems-Navistar team, Lockheed Martin-BAE Systems team, and an AM General-General Dynamics team called General Tactical Vehicles.

The following month, the Northrop-Oshkosh and Textron-Boeing-SAIC teams protested the Army’s decision, alleging, among other things, that the selection process emphasized the existence of demonstrator vehicles despite no written requirement in the request for bids.

More details regarding the GAO’s findings will be made available in the coming days.


Article at: http://armytimes.com/news/2009/02/defense_gao_jltv_021709/%2e



uhc comment: The JLTV appears to be a cross between an armored hummer and an MRAP. (The last batch of MRAPS cost around $1,000,000+ each.)

Here's a 2008 article from defensereview.com:



http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1191
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC