Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huge Surge Logistics Bill Coming

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:00 AM
Original message
Huge Surge Logistics Bill Coming
Huge Surge Logistics Bill Coming
By Robbin Laird Friday, December 11th, 2009 9:43 am
Posted in Air, International, Land, Naval, Policy

President Obama has com­mit­ted to a major new phase of the Afghan cam­paign. With the sub­stan­tial mis­sion expan­sion comes a sig­nif­i­cant demand for new resources to deal with the most ignored part of oper­a­tions to the out­sider, logis­tics and sus­tain­ment costs.

Afghanistan is not Iraq, to quote General Petraeus. This is true in mul­ti­ple ways, but no more so than in terms of oper­a­tions and logis­tics. The geog­ra­phy and ter­rain in Afghanistan require what the Marines call “dis­trib­uted oper­a­tions,” and with what the Corps calls “expe­di­tionary logis­tics.” And such logis­tics require air assets to con­nect deployed forces, and with those air assets come sig­nif­i­cant energy and bas­ing costs. For exam­ple, two mil­lion pounds of cargo were air dropped in the­ater. For September of 2009, the Air Force air-​​dropped nearly four mil­lion pounds with an esti­mated 20 mil­lion pounds to be air dropped for the cal­en­dar year.

The cost per deployed sol­dier in Afghanistan will be mul­ti­ples higher than for the deployed sol­dier in Iraq. Dependent on which ana­lyst is doing the assess­ment, the num­ber ranges from two to four times higher.

Not only are direct costs sig­nif­i­cant, but secu­rity con­sid­er­a­tions are as well. There are few major air­fields out of which to oper­ate; these air­fields pro­vide tar­gets for the use of bio or chem­i­cal weapons to dis­able those airfields.

And the surge car­ries with it a with­drawal imper­a­tive. This means that ramp­ing up forces in coun­try entails the very sig­nif­i­cant logis­tics costs of with­drawal as well. If we know any­thing from the expe­ri­ence of the cur­rent with­drawal from Iraq, logis­tics, even in the best of cir­cum­stances, costs tens of bil­lions of dol­lars to exe­cute a withdrawal.


Rest of article at: http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/12/11/huge-bill-coming-for-surge-logistics/?wh=wh
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can someone tie a single payer amendment to it PLEASE?
It would be only fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC