|
I mean, not just everyone decides that there's merit in a heretical sect that was virtually hounded out of existence. Usually it's a faith that one comes to after a period of dissatisfaction with mainstream religions, especially Catholic Christianity. So we search through other faiths, being influenced by what we learn, and then eventually end up Gnostic.
What I've found is that Gnostics are actually better versed in the Bible than most modern Christians. It's because of the unusual questions, contradictions, and unexplained statements that send pre-Gnostics questing for meaning. Many of the modern Christians that I've talked to have never even read the whole Bible. They tend to rely on Church authorities to tell them what's in it and what the stories mean. That just won't do for a Gnostic. We have to KNOW for ourselves.
Faith. Bah! Deity talks to us all, if you just listen. Who needs middlemen/women?
Gnostics usually want to find out for themselves. We tend to be very anti-authority. Similar to the Quaker non-leader format (which I consider a Gnostic Church in spirit, if not in reality), several Gnostic sects never used to have Priests but would draw lots at each meeting to choose the leader for the day. The Catholic Church hated that as it took away the entire reason for their existence--and thus, the persecution had to start.
Not that I like Dan Brown's writing--I'm more a Foucault's Pendulum/Illuminatus type of a guy--I think the DaVinci book and coming film will draw even more people into examining Gnostic beliefs. That's the main reason Robertson, Falwell and the rest of the religious right hate Brown's books.
|