|
But having thought about it a lot over the years, I've come to the conclusion that for all they're so snide and disdainful about Christianity, Randroids actually worship money and prestige, or at least many of them do, and Ayn's texts certainly would indicate she thinks worshiping money is superior to either worshiping God or caring about the well-being of humanity. In my thinking, they're not really atheists if they drink enough of her particularly sour brand of Kool-Aid -- they worship money and eugenics. If you read her stuff, her reverence and bigotry are clear -- and they're parallel, if not the same, to the reverence for God and the bigotry against anybody who believes differently that many religions practice. These things are endemic to many religions, Christianity doesn't get a pass with me.
If old sour-puss were writing today, she probably would have found a way to rationalize the uneasy marriage of her much-loved economic and political philosophies with religion -- religion itself has evolved away from helping the oppressed and helpless, in part because of its pandering to the right-wingers who've ridden it like a birthday party pony to gain office so that it might have more control over culture and social mores. I could be wrong, maybe she wouldn't ... but I bet she would. I bet religion would be A-OK with ol' Ayn if she were writing the same screeds in the current social and political climate.
That being said, I haven't known all that many agnostics/humanists/atheists over the years, anyway -- most of the ones I've known, I've met through liberal political organizations, though I did work with a guy several years ago who considered himself a big-l 'Libertarian' who was an atheist. He was, as I've often said, a 'dope smoking Republican' -- he wanted to be left alone to live with his girlfriends in peace and smoke dope, that's the only thing that separated him from most mainstream modern Republicans and from Christians. Other than that, he loved to make moralistic remarkes about Bill Clinton, and thought GW was great. He was one of those people who doubtless couldn't enjoy music because there had to have been a constant clamor of cognitive dissonance in his head.
I think being raised by progressives, encouraged to think for myself and educate myself, and never being told outright 'don't read/look at/ think about' any particular idea or philosophy enabled me to make a rational evaluation of my involvement with religion when I was ready to admit I didn't believe what I'd been told anymore. I don't know, though, if it's the fact that the left has, historically, tried to be a 'big tent' political philosophy that has made non-believers more comfortable with that affiliation, or if it's that liberal economic philosophy makes more sense in a logical perspective (and it does, especially from the sociological viewpoint). In my case, I started out Christian with liberal parents, and have only gone farther left politically since I ceased to believe because I was willing to accept factual information about social issues that my parents (who never got past high school) wouldn't have known.
|