Woohoo! I got prostletyzed to on YouTube!!!

[laconicsax]

I must have hit it big. By posting exactly zero videos, commenting only on a handful of music-related videos, and favoriting videos I liked, I have really hit the big time! This showed up in my YouTube inbox a couple days ago:

Just so u understand...
...it would be no problem or hurt to try leaving aside presumptuous & try giving an open mind for now. :) Perhaps try LISTENING instead of conjuring up cheep wishful thinking that hinder u from listening to the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWfp3E9jV34">Watch SID ROTH, atheists! (link)
Science is always a great start-off!
http://www.sidroth.org/site/News2?abbr=tv_&page=NewsArticle&id=9555&news_iv_ctrl=1141

Sent to: alesspiano, angrybitterrealist, madrice27, cfar7399, krogoth04, cryptidlover101, punkinutter123, patrioticrationalist, specialfred1234, kotok123, badaladka, omnipotentanthropoid, creeper17, tntxkrypton, nurkett, shadowtitan1, hellonland, polonaise2008, laconicsax, britishbroom, mstartelette, ravenwolffen, gregdwulet, ricky0604fh, tonnoh

I went over to the guy's channel and was promptly greeted by a Kent Hovind video that proclaims that the Bible is scientifically accurate, and the linked video is your typical 'moron at a desk talking to a webcam' video stating how totally awesome Sid Roth is, and that Truth^TM will always triumph over the closed minds of atheists.

(In case you don't know who Sid Roth is, he's a Messianic Jew who has a show called "It's Supernatural!" which is part of a "God-ordained strategy" to convert everyone to Christianity by giving a forum to people who want to share their supernatural experiences.)

BTW, my reply to the creationist spammer:

Thank you so very much for sharing your wisdom with me. Happy New Year.

Sincerely,
laconicsax

[BlueJazz]

1. 'Thank you so very much for sharing your idiocy with me. Happy New Year'.

:) :)

[laconicsax]

2. I try to take the high road as soon as possible--it pisses off those types to no end. n/t

[toddaa]

3. Any idea what the bait was?

[laconicsax]

4. No idea.

I was briefly tempted to look up to look up the other users on the list, but I decided that posting here was a better use of my time.

[Iggo]

5. Well...maybe you SHOULD try leaving aside presumptuous.

Did you even think of that? No? Gah!

(EDIT: Jeez. I can't even spell wrong right.)