|
after reading both threads I struggled on whether or not i should wade in here, but here goes......
ModemButterfly...From reading your posts I have the opinion that you are an intelligent, lucid person with compassion and the conviction of your opinions (here it comes) BUT i think this is perhaps one of those opinions that might have been better stated in perhaps a more diplomatic way, or better yet, one that, in retrospect, left to this forum. It seems to me that upon calmer reflection, you might think you were doing a bit of tilting at windmills. Like many that post on this forum on DU, i am MOST CERTAINLY an Atheist. I think that overt suggestions that there is a sky fairy looking after us all is not only childish but intellectually primitive thinking. I think that the assumption made by most Americans (And apparently, most DU'ers) that a simple X shape in a particular orientation and used in a particular way COULD NEVER BE OFFENSIVE is, quite frankly, offensive.
This is, I hope, one area of DU where I can say (Because it doesn't appear on the main page of latest threads - if it did, i couldn't) that it is my opinion that folks that actually hold onto the idea of an anthropomorphic super Deity (The god of Abraham and Isaac, specifically) as a real thing have quite frankly, not given it enough rational, logical thought and are therefore, for lack of a better way of putting it, deluded. And in many cases, deluded ENTIRELY because they are too fucking lazy to do the investigation and research into a body o beliefs they hold dear SPECIFICALLY because said investigation will tend to shred the nice, comfy security blanket they have surrounded themselves with.
Having said all that I must point out the obvious: we live in a country OVERWHELMINGLY populated by folks that fit precisely into that mold and as such see nothing wrong at all with memorials and shrines that follow that mindset.
When i saw the photos of the mown down crosses i was....well.....nonplussed. I kind of expected something like that to happen and i am quite sure the guilty party would tell us all that there IS a god in heaven and he was most certainly going there.
Making the entirely logical argument that they should be replaced with something less sectarian is, in my mind, a bit like tilting at a windmill. Those crosses are certainly a universally recognizable symbol for most Americans and, in the spirit for which they were installed, don't represent anything more than what they represent - those killed in this moronic war.
ModemButterfly, Please, PLEASE don't think for a second that i am presumptuous enough to tell you how to think or how or what to post about. Quite the contrary, i admire you for sticking to your guns and standing up for what you hold dear. I just think in this case you perhaps were stepping over a line that is there, even though we don't like it and don't feel we should have to stay away from. When i see someone wearing one of those gaudy crosses around their necks i am ALWAYS compelled to ask them "What does the lower case "T" stand for?" but i don't. Why? Because it is a line I don't want to cross because it is ...well...pointless. Telling that person they are a fucking moron for wearing a symbol of torture and death around their necks or embracing a philosophical conviction that is asinine will do nothing to further my search for truth and it certainly wont convince that nimrod that he is being a nimrod.
I took the liberty of looking at the profiles of both Will Pitt and ModemButterfly. Both have been members since '01 but Mr. Pitt has nearly 34,000 posts while MB has less than 7000. This tells me a couple things. Mr. Pitt is the one spending much more time sitting in front of his computer than you do MB, my dear internet acquaintance and as such, has no business telling ANYONE how to spend their time.
You are in the right. I agree with your point of view. The memorial at "Arlington West" SHOULD look like Arlington National Cemetery or it is mis-named. But to make an issue of it at this point in time is perhaps and in my opinion, counterproductive.
Please accept this monologue in the spirit in which it is intended: that is to point out that telling the nimrods they are nimrods does nothing for the nimrods.
At at the end of the day, i'll bet the whole thing just made you feel exasperated. And for that, you have my understanding and i share your exasperation.
|