|
Edited on Sat Apr-24-10 11:22 AM by romana
I have nothing against big plays. They certainly make the game entertaining. Parv is a perfect example of someone who knows how to make a big, aggressive play, and the differences in her approach and JT's are very illuminating.
JT essentially based his big play on a stupid, public comment from Rupert, and there was simply no way this strategy was going to work for him. That immunity idol was far better kept in the heroes tribe than in the hands of the enemy. Had Rupert made his comment privately, back at their own camp, and JT acted, I might have a little bit of respect for JT's game play. As it stands, however, it was dumb and doomed to failure as he gave the villains the ammunition they needed to get rid of him. JT also had no backup plan. When you have to be essentially shamed into forming a backup plan by Rupert you have failed at Survivor.
Parv, on the other hand, kept her own council. She put on a public, strategic face, and schemed in private. When it came time to make her big play, she did it on her own with no input from anyone (as far as we can tell--I don't watch the secret videos or anything because I just don't have the time). She didn't even tell her closest ally in the game, Russell, what she was planning. And that's why it worked. Big plays are much more likely to work if people keep it close to the vest. When you broadcast what your intentions are you paint a big target on your back.
I will amend that JT is probably not the stupidest player ever. But IMO he's pretty high up there. There are ways he could've played that idol to his and his tribe's advantage, and he picked the stupidest.
|