I'm writing this as a compliment to my GD post:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8778821 I'm closing on 7 acres of land this week, and setting out on my 20 year-old-dream of building my own house on my own land. My goal is to build something sustainable and energy efficient, as you might expect. I've been tracking and/or researching green building techniques for years, and feel confident that I can accomplish this task, save for one issue: my local county board.
Why is that?
Well, it seems that 'green' building is largely poo-pooed by our local fiefdoms, who much prefer that you go the far more expensive and far less efficient route of building something -- for lack of a better phrase: "to code."
"Code" is the codified term for maintaining the revenue stream for the well-connected status quo, at the peril of progress or anything else. Come hell or high-water (literally, in some cases), these small-minded folks see fit deny attempts at green building at nearly every turn.
Sure, there is a way around this issue: Money.
Money, you see, solves everything.
This is the crux of the problem with our society, in my opinion: We stave off progress and maintain the status quo for the sake of the status quo itself.
Ultimately, this will be our undoing, again, in my opinion.
So I'm tossing this out there for feedback. What we need to fight this issue is a lobbyist group of some sort. A single voice cannot win against a closed-system. If green builders, architects, property owners and engineers got together, perhaps we could put a few cracks in that iron wall.
What do you think?