Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone remember Dennis' plan for getting the US out of Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Dennis Kucinich Supporters Group Donate to DU
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 06:06 PM
Original message
Does anyone remember Dennis' plan for getting the US out of Iraq?
Maybe we need to bring this up again. There are posts in GD and I think more & more people just want us out. As I recall DK's plan made mega sense.....
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. UN in, US out
It's probably still on his issues page at www.kucinich.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. it is here . . .
http://www.kucinich.us/bringourtroopshome.php

The Kucinich Plan to Bring Our Troops Home

NEW - Animation by Eric Blumrich
"Iraq War"
(requires Macromedia Flash)
Warning: Contains graphic images some viewers may find shocking.

Dennis Kucinich:

"The war in Iraq is over and the occupation has turned into a quagmire. The United States troops have become the targets of criminals and terrorists who are flowing into Iraq for the chance to kill Americans. The cost of the occupation keeps rising: The President has already asked for more than $155 billion to pay for it, and there is no end in sight. The United Nations is now in an impossible situation, where most of the members view the war and occupation of Iraq as a U.S. folly. Under these circumstances, the UN is unlikely to help. And UN assistance with a U.S. occupation would not allow the establishment of an Iraqi government that was acceptable to the Iraqi people.

"U.S. military casualties in Iraq have now exceeded 500, and the media has begun comparing the figure to the number of U.S. dead in Vietnam in 1965 prior to the significant expansion of U.S. operations there.

"Other Democrats join the Bush Administration in explaining that 'We can't cut and run.' I say we can't continue the damage we are causing and cannot begin repairing it until we withdraw our occupying army. We must pay for what we destroyed. We must pay reparations to the families of innocent civilians we killed and injured. But we must work through the United Nations. We must allow the United Nations to facilitate the creation of a democratic government that will be acceptable to the Iraqi people. No government created by the United States will be. It is better that we recognize this now than after the next 500 deaths.

"If we stay the course it will do damage to American security. Iraq was not responsible for 9/11 and had no weapons of mass destruction. It was wrong to go in and it's wrong to stay in. The demands of an occupation are overstretching our armed forces. And the extended deployment of reserve forces makes us vulnerable at home. The reserve call-ups include large numbers of firemen, policemen and other first responders who are needed for hometown security. Americans are asking, is there a way out? I say there is. This is my plan to get the UN in ... and the U.S. out of Iraq! This plan will bring our troops home within 90 days of UN approval, and strengthen American security.

"The following is my detailed plan to quickly bring all U.S. troops home from Iraq:

The United States must ask the United Nations to manage the oil assets of Iraq until the Iraqi people are self-governing.

The United Nations must handle all the contracts: No more Halliburton sweetheart deals, No contracts to Bush Administration insiders, No contracts to campaign contributors. All contracts must be awarded under transparent conditions.

The United States must renounce any plans to privatize Iraq. It is illegal under both the Geneva and the Hague Conventions for any nation to invade another nation, seize its assets, and sell those assets. The Iraqi people, and the Iraqi people alone must have the right to determine the future of their country's resources.

The United States must ask the United Nations to handle the transition to Iraqi self-governance. The UN must be asked to help the Iraqi people develop a Constitution. The UN must assist in developing free and fair elections.

The United States must agree to pay for what we blew up.

The United States must pay reparations to the families of innocent Iraqi civilian noncombatants killed and injured in the conflict.

The United States must contribute financially to the UN peacekeeping mission.

The United Nations, through its member nations, will commit 130,000 peacekeepers to Iraq on a temporary basis until the Iraqi people can maintain their own security.

UN troops will rotate into Iraq, and all U.S. troops will come home.

The United States will abandon policies of "preemption" and unilateralism and commit to strengthening the UN.

"I am working tirelessly to take America in a new direction, to gain approval of this plan at the United Nations, and to put it into action, bring all U.S. troops home in 90 days. Only if the United States takes a new direction will we be able to persuade the UN community to participate. Such a new direction is reflected in this 10-point plan.

"The President should go to the UN and announce America's intention to abide by this plan if approved by the UN.

"He should ask the UN Security Council to ratify a new resolution on Iraq that would deploy a multinational force under UN mandate to keep the peace in Iraq while the interim Iraqi government receives UN support and a new Iraqi government is elected. It is my plan that within one month, the first UN troops and support personnel will arrive in Iraq, and the first U.S. troops will be sent home. UN peacekeeping troops and Iraqis who are commissioned as police and military will replace the U.S. In place of the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority, the UN will open an office to direct the repair to infrastructure damaged by U.S. invasion. In two months, the UN will begin to conduct a census of the Iraqi population to lay groundwork for national elections. At the same time, new temporary rules for the election will be promulgated, guaranteeing universal suffrage on a one-person, one-vote basis. During the transition period, a Memorandum of Understanding between the American and UN force commanders for a turnover period will settle the question of who commands the troops. By the end of month three, all U.S. troops will have returned home.

"In month four, a major milestone will be reached when Iraqi sovereignty is established. A nationwide election will take place to elect representatives to a Constitutional Convention. The Convention will have two duties: 1) elect a temporary Prime Minister who appoints a cabinet to take over responsibility from the Iraqi Governing Council, and 2) draft a national constitution. Accountability of this Prime Minister is achieved by virtue of the fact that he can be recalled by a majority of the Convention.

"In one year, there will be nationwide elections pursuant to the new Constitution, which will install an elected government in Iraq.

"The U.S. owes a moral debt to the people of Iraq for the damage caused by the U.S. invasion. The U.S. will also owe a contribution to the UN to help Iraq make the transition to self-government. American taxpayers deserve that their contributions be handled in an accountable, highly visible manner. However, Americans are not required to build a state-of-the-art infrastructure as the Administration is planning. The Administration is ordering top-shelf technology from U.S. corporations for Iraq, paid for by U.S. taxpayers. Sweetheart deals have been awarded with billions of dollars to top corporations and political contributors. This is precisely what corrupts the Administration's reconstruction efforts today. Instead, Iraqis should be employed to repair Iraq, and U.S. taxpayers should pay only for the damage caused by the U.S. invasion, including compensation for its victims. U.S. taxpayers should not be asked to furnish Iraq with what we do not have here!

"The war and occupation in Iraq have been costly in other ways too. One price America has paid is the loss of our moral authority in the world. The Administration launched an unprovoked attack on Iraq, and the premises of the war are proving to be false. This has cost us our credibility and done serious harm to America's standing in the world. After the attacks of 9-11, the world felt sympathy for us. But this war and the occupation have squandered that sympathy, replacing it with dangerous anti-American sentiment throughout the world.

"America must make a dramatic reversal of course: we must acknowledge that the continued U.S. military presence in Iraq is counterproductive and destabilizing. We have a choice in front of us: either we change course, withdraw our troops and request that the UN move in, or we sink deeper into this occupation, with more U.S. casualties, ever higher financial costs, and diminished security for all Americans.

"We need a real change. My plan will bring the troops home in 90 days, transfer authority to the UN with provisions made toward a rapid transition to Iraqi sovereignty, and save billions of dollars. It will enable the U.S. to think creatively about how to deal with threats that come not from established countries with conventional armies (our armed forces are more than adequate to that task), but rather threats that come from networks of terrorists and criminals who use unconventional means to injure Americans. We must also apprehend the criminals who masterminded the 9-11 attacks on our nation, a goal that is hindered by the occupation of Iraq. Lastly, my plan will also enable the U.S. to redirect scarce resources to rebuild America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. If only they would have listened...
to a lot of the things he said...OK everything he said.

Thanks for this goodhue...just nice to read his words again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was just thinking about this the other day.
I heard someone mention the need for an "exit strategy" on the radio while I was driving to work.

I wanted to tell them to call Dennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Plain Dealer article
http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/111106063773060.xml

U.S. Rep Dennis Kucinich, a Democrat of Cleveland, disagreed. Kucinich, the only Ohioan to vote against the measure, said it's time to "stand up and reject these policies" with a phased withdrawal that would turn over Iraq security responsibility to United Nations peacekeepers.

"Before we issue another $82 billion for operations in Iraq to continue a failed policy, we must address the greater picture," a Kucinich statement said. "The administration has been morally corrupt in its handling of every aspect of the Iraq war." House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, a Republican of Texas, said the bill will "send a message to everyone captive to tyranny that their victory is assured, that though the cause of human freedom may stumble, it will never fall."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Funny you should say this. In the GD thread asking where we stood before

the war,I just posted this:


Yes, I was right, and so was Dennis Kucinich. When the war began,

Kucinich issued a statement saying it was a mistake and we should bring our soldiers home immediately. Dennis continued to speak out against the war when others Dems were saying "Well, we have troops on the ground, and I support the troops, blah blah, " or even refused to question Bush** as commander in chief.

Dennis said "I support getting the troops out so they aren't killed in a useless war."

Dennis filed suit to force Bush** to end the war.

Dennis spoke at anti-war rallies and continued to lobby for the Department of Peace he believes we need to work against war and other forms of violence.

Dennis Kucinich is an American hero who had remained loyal to the Democratic Party when it has given him very little respect.

Dennis Kucinich is the only politician I've ever supported who hasn't disappointed me.

DENNIS KUCINICH FOR PRESIDENT 2008


:kick: for DENNIS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Dennis Kucinich Supporters Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC