|
I think that Kerry can't follow the same pattern as 2004. His name recognition and people's view that they know him is higher. I hope that he gradually picks up a good proportion of the people who give up on a candidate. Here it looks like Kerry and Gore (and don't know) were the winners of those leaving Hillary. This could make sense - that as she is the establishment candidate many are looking for someone with gravitas, experience and strength. If Gore continues to say he is not running and doesn't endorse anyone, a big question is will Kerry pick up a large part of those voters? (Remember DU Gore voters are likely not representative - and even here several say they like Kerry, but Gore deserves it more (or some other thing).
If Kerry's percent going into the debates is 15% - 20%, he would be in good shape. He is by far the best debater - he improved substantially between spring and fall 2004. His appearances on the talk shows - some require answers similar to debate questions - have improved enormously. (I really wonder if Hillary's strategy of never having these interviews and no primary debate is wise. It does reduce her exposure, but it means she will have little practice.)
The good news here: - Hillary is less ahead - but still VERY much a favorite. If people actually here she is losing support, she may hemorage more if there are many "picking the winner" people.
- Warner's barage of positive press in the media and in the blogosphere is not making an impact. Nor is the fawning Edwards' press. Biden (a threat to Kerry as they both can compete on the basis of foreign policy expertise) is also going nowhere - even though some in the press have pushed him and he seems to always be on Sunday TV.
|