Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'd love to hear your opinions on this, and wonder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:09 PM
Original message
I'd love to hear your opinions on this, and wonder
if the good senator has read it. Borrowed from another thread, originally posted on dailykos. I'm skeptical about a few of these rules, but the guy makes sense overall. I do not agree with all the possible candidates he apparently would support.


Madison Ave. Ad Exec Reveals How GOP Wins Elections

by Mr Populist
Sat Sep 09, 2006 at 09:47:53 AM PDT

The diary entry I'm posting today is not my own but a public domain essay written by an anonymous writer who describes himself as a "high powered Madison Ave. advertising executive." He uses the alias "Coty Jarrett" because many of his clients are Republican politicians and opinion leaders. His motive for writing the essay is simple: he's sympathetic to the Democrats and wants to pass on privileged information on how Republicans win elections. He conveys it in the form of an open letter to all Democratic candidates and campaign managers in elections this fall.

I first saw it on the Huffington blog and saved it because it was a brilliant but cynical essay on the deployment of power in the manner of Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince. I'm not sure if Coty Jarrett's Rules of Perception has ever been posted on the Daily Kos, but I searched the tagging index and came up empty handed. Even if it's been posted and discussed on the Daily Kos previously, I think it's worth revisiting.

Mr Populist's diary :: ::
Here is his list of rules, in the form of an open letter to all Democratic congressional candidates (and their campaign managers) this fall:

THE RULES OF PERCEPTION

John Kerry went to Vietnam, saved a man's life and was wounded. Somehow, the voters perceived of John Kerry as a coward who never served his country and would not be tough enough as our commander-in-chief. George W. Bush avoided Vietnam and failed to fulfill his National Guard obligation. Somehow, the people of this country perceived of George W. Bush as a heroic military man and a courageous commander-in-chief.

This is called MANAGING PERCEPTION. Not just managing the perception people have of YOUR guy, but more importantly, managing the perception people have of the OTHER guy! In 2004, more people perceived that Kerry was bad and Bush was good. Just enough people for Bush to win the election.
Which brings us to a cold hard fact: if the Democrats want to take back Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008, they must become as good as Karl Rove at managing perception. The good news is, it's not some trick only Karl Rove knows the secret to. Managing perception is not even all that difficult once you know the rules.

RULE ONE
Pick ONE INDIVIDUAL to head up your election team and give this person TOTAL AUTHORITY to manage all advertising messages and perception issues. Whatever he or she says -- goes! And no more discussion.

There were 29 people in charge of Kerry, including Kerry himself. The public heard 29 different viewpoints. The Republicans had one person in charge: Rove. The public heard one viewpoint: Rove's. Americans are used to single-minded powerful selling messages, and they like a single-minded powerful point-of-view.

Hint!
Choose the roughest, toughest person who has ever created wildly successful advertising and PR campaigns. Make damned sure this person is a real marketer, doesn't take any guff from anybody and is NOT a political stooge. Make sure ALL money flows to this one person and all spending is coordinated through this person. (Strong hint: if the DNC drafted Donnie Deutsch, they'd take it all.)

RULE TWO
Learn how to disseminate simple catchphrases the mainstream media can use. Like Rove when he invented "cut and run" -- which Fox and the mainstream media lapped up like a thirsty dog. You need to do this with the same dexterity and speed. You will never exceed Rove in this, but you can do AS WELL as he does, which would basically neutralize his effectiveness in the media.

Just watch Fox News (Official News Channel of the successful invasion of Iraq and media/PR representative for the Swift Boat Veterans For Truth). You may hate them, but they're incredibly effective at spreading the Rovian catchphrase of the day and using it to rally the faithful, while keeping GOP politicians in lockstep and on message!

Hint!
You do not have a media outlet like Fox, so you must work twice as hard to get the mainstream media to carry your message to ALL voters. Importantly, do not believe the mainstream media is for you and against Republicans. They're not. If you somehow think they'll help you win an election, you've already lost.

RULE THREE
When the other side hands you a bone, do not bury the bone! USE IT! The best way to negatively affect the perception of the other side is to use their own bone against them!
"I voted for it before I voted against it" was a bone Karl Rove shook in our face the entire campaign. It perfectly defined Kerry as a "flip-flopper". When Bush said, "I don't think much about Bin Laden," Kerry should have said, "Bin Laden murdered three thousand Americans and you promised you'd kill him! Why didn't you, you flip-flopping coward?"

Hint!
Cheer up. You missed your chance, but there'll be more. Rudy blamed the grunts for missing that weapons cache. Ask the Mayor why he's not supporting the troops!

RULE FOUR
Understand that you are dealing with a target audience that doesn't care enough, or simply refuses to devote the time to learn the real facts regarding the real issues. Instead, their perception has BECOME the facts!

The target audience fervently believed Saddam Hussein WAS behind the 9/11 attacks and there WERE weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Just as they believe today that the second in command of Al Qaeda has been killed or captured at least a dozen times -- AND they've conveniently forgotten that Osama Bin Laden is not only still alive, but happily and calmly planning future attacks against our country.

Hint!
Do not try to change this reality. Work with it. The perception you create IS the reality! Take heart! If they perceive something despite obvious evidence to the contrary, you will be able to make them perceive any number of things! Including your point of view! Rove knows this and uses it -- you must too!

RULE FIVE
Stop playing by "Marquess of Queensberry" rules. Before you get punched, you punch. Hard. Whenever possible, you punch below the belt. And most importantly, even after they are down, you keep punching.

George Bush. Cocaine. Alcohol. The National Guard. Deserter. With 40 days to go before the election, there should have been 40 awful revelations about George Bush -- one each day, each worse than the one before it.

Hint!
Stop being a candy-ass. If you start lamenting, "I'm becoming just like THEM", you have just guaranteed their victory. They currently OWN the playing field. You either play by their rules or YOU ARE GOING TO LOSE. Your job is to punch hard and neutralize their negative attacks by being just as nasty. IF you make it back into office, THEN you can start working to reform how people get elected. For now, you must get mean!

RULE SIX
NO MORE NUANCE. The target not only fails to understand even the most obvious nuance, they actually HATE the idea there should be nuance at all (it even sounds French!). Nuance = bad. Black and white = good!

"A marriage is a sacred union between a man and a woman" -- George Bush.

"I'm personally against gay marriage, but I feel the states should decide." -- John Kerry (too nuanced by half!)

Hint!
Come off your high horse and forget that issues really DO demand nuance, at least until the election is over. Until November, pick a side on each issue and make sure your target audience understands CLEARLY what that side is. And relax! The only people you'll sound like a simpleton to are already voting for you anyway.

RULE SEVEN
Choose ONE VERY CLEAR LABEL for your candidate and NEVER let go of it. Keep hitting it hard until everyone in America knows it is EXACTLY what your candidate stands for.
George Bush was the "unwavering commander-in-chief who won the war on terror." John Kerry was ____. Whatever he was wasn't as bad as you think, but we're still not able to fill in that blank.

Hint!
Think of a one-word label that your target can quickly grasp. "America, I am the Jobs President!" Don't worry about which label is best. Just choose one and let that be the centerpiece. All other things the candidate talks about should grow out of this one strong position. And remember -- no matter how Rove tries to re-define you (and he will, constantly) -- make sure this one label sticks to you like glue!

RULE EIGHT
Devote a tremendous amount of time and spend a huge portion of your campaign money finding, recruiting, training and firing up VOLUNTEERS. As odd as it may sound, if you spend $100 million on TV, you MUST spend $200 million creating a massive, incredibly well-coordinated volunteer effort.
Karl Rove used pinpoint research to find and motivate volunteers who went where no campaign had gone before -- into parts of Florida where alligators were more likely to vote than people. In Ohio, Rove's volunteers dragged Republicans out of their corporate meetings to make sure they voted! It's why he won and you lost.

Hint!
Your volunteers MUST BE A MEMBER OF YOUR TARGET AUDIENCE. You need to find volunteers who attend the same church, go to the same stores and like and dislike the same things your target audience does! Remember, you cannot spend TOO MUCH money or do TOO MUCH demographic homework and research making this happen! Just so you know, Republicans do NOT own a patent on this type of research!

RULE NINE
Do not give Karl Rove any help whatsoever. In other words, do not start with a candidate who puts you in a twenty-foot ditch that Rove will never let you fight your way out of. Make damned sure your candidate has the gumption to come out swinging and immediately counter-punch every Swift Boat move Rove tries.

This is no walk in the park, but it is not impossible. Remember, George W. Bush did not have to defeat John Kerry. With Rove calling all the shots, John Kerry defeated John Kerry.

Hint!
Work hard against the nomination of anybody who cannot remain strong and stay firm on base issues while tacking to the center in a convincing, spirited way.

Hint! Hint!
Bill Richardson. Mark Warner. And yeah, Al Gore!

RULE TEN
Stop trying to be ATTAP, or "All Things To All People". You will fail. There is no way in this great country of ours that you will ever be more than 65% of things to 55% of the people. That's your goal, by the way. You reach it and you own Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008.
Karl Rove didn't bother with liberals or most Democrats. He went after his base and the squishy center and didn't waste any time or money on anybody else. He also didn't care what anybody else thought of him or his candidate.

Hint!
By all means, rally your base. Then go figure out what you can actually say to the squishy center and spend MOST of your time and money winning them over. And for heaven's sake, don't worry about what dyed-in-the-wool Republicans think about what you're saying. They're not voting for you anyway.

RULE ELEVEN
Start today. Not later today. NOW! Start figuring out now where you're going to find your own Karl Rove and then get this person started. Any time you waste is going to make it tougher for you to win in 2006 and 2008.

By the time the Democrats got around to throwing a few punches in 2004, they were defensive punches, and way too late. Today, right now, Karl Rove has already picked his candidate and crafted a strategy he is confident will whomp your stupid Democratic butt. And make no mistake about it: he has ALREADY dug up tons of dirt on the 20 people YOU are most likely to nominate.
Hint!
Don't put off your homework for tomorrow morning. Collect data on whoever they might nominate. Spend some time NOW figuring out how to effectively deal with anybody and everybody they might nominate.

RULE TWELVE
Keep a copy of these rules by your pillow and read them every night. When you wake up, make damned sure you follow them every day. If you adhere to these rules, you are going to NEUTRALIZE Rove by making this Rove Versus Rove. That might sound horrible and off-putting, but what it actually means is that the race will NOT come down to perception, but instead, level the playing field, so you might actually have a chance to win!

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/9/9/124753/8755
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is complete BS!
Edited on Sat Sep-09-06 06:47 PM by ProSense
A lot of stupid generalizations and nonsense! One point:

Hint!
You do not have a media outlet like Fox, so you must work twice as hard to get the mainstream media to carry your message to ALL voters. Importantly, do not believe the mainstream media is for you and against Republicans. They're not. If you somehow think they'll help you win an election, you've already lost.


Who the hell believes the media should help them win elections? The media simply should not spew GOP talking points (see Path to 9/11, or calls for apologies to Rove), nor should the media hire right wing hacks like Jonathan Kaplan!

Any valid points the piece makes, such as "stop trying to be all things to all people," is couched nonsensical statements like this: "Karl Rove didn't bother with liberals or most Democrats." Rove and the GOP/media did everything to distort perception, and not just among wingnuts. They also resorted to a lot of dirty tricks that had a negative impact on people not in their base!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The writer's cynicism does get in the way, but I thought some of
his points are valid. Thanks for your opinion, ProSense, which I value. This piece has been a big hit on DU, so thought I'd find out everyone's views here.

This is the original thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2819242
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree with Sandsea
I also say that the DU'ers that think this is great info are just a mirror image of Republicans. I'm a Democrat and I will not stoop to Republican tactics especially those of Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thanks! I added
my comment to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I think this is mainly garbage
Of course it is loved on DU because it says what many of them have said. It ignores many realities:
- Bush, as President in a time of war, used terror alerts to change the subject whenever Kerry was gaining.

- There were not 29 plus people defining Kerry. Kerry was Kerry. Do you seriously think having Danny D. define Kerry is a super good idea? Does he even have a clue as to who Kerry really is?

- Media:
He mentioned they had FOX as an in-house network. He fails to mention that they also had a substantial majority of the other station's talking heads. Remember how many Republicans commented on Hardball about the Democratic convention versus Democrats. Easily 3 to 1, and the one was Ron Reagan, an independent. Same for the Republican. Remember the debates - again more Republicans.
Also consider who the Democratic cable talking heads were - Carville and Begala - who excelled at making snarky counter productive Bush cracks and moaning that Kerry was not Clinton. (true, Clinton has little of Kerry's integrity, honor or principles.) Remember even as Kerry won primary after primary they babbled on about the possibility of a brokered convention backing Hillary.

He fails to mention the 2 leading usually liberal newspapers were very positive on neo-con ideas then. (Look at coverage of Bush's 2nd inaugural address. They were still open to spreading democracy by force to change the dynamics.

Using Machiavellian tactics, when the media favors the other side will backfire. We will look nasty and willing to break rules. Their tactics worked because the media did not call them on them. (Think: Let's say several network anchors editorialized that the Republicans wearing purple heart band aids were disgusting. This would have made some people stop and think. By NOT doing this, they sent the message that it was politics as usual - which suggests that Kerry did something to deserve his medals being questioned. These people are opinion leaders and that was their implicit view on this. Now imagine that someone favoring (non-veteran) Clinton had mentioned that Dole's WWII injury was caused by a stupid action on his part and Clinton didn't publicly disavow the charge and disassociate himself from this person. Imagine if the funding went back to major Clinton backers.)

-The Democrats:
Look at the entire party rallying to protect Bill Clinton. As soon as the media latched on to the SBVT, ALL major Democrats should have screamed that ALL the Navy records backed Kerry and beat the Republicans over the head when they besmirched Kerry's purple hearts - that he DID NOT award to himself. (Only Clark and Cleland did a great job on this)

It was BLOGGERS not major Democrats who fought Sinclair.

Remember the reason Hillary didn't run in 2004, is that it appeared unwinnable 2 years out. Kerry nearly won in spite of the Republicans illegally using the government (terror and "ads" paid by the government), a biased media, local parties that were weak in many places, and lukewarm support from some Democrats, who wanted a Clinton restoration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. RULE ONE
Divide and conquer.

Hint!

Whenever someone trashes Dems under the guise of "Helpful Hints", beware!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. So you didn't find any validity in any of the points? I realize
the writer was overly snarky, but I'm not so sure he's a GOP operative either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh no, not a GOP operative
There's a reason Richardson, Warner and... oh yeah Gore.. are the Dems mentioned in a piece targeted at the internet.

Yes Dems need to do a better job of branding, but that isn't what this piece is about at all. And I don't want to be a part of the brand that the tactics in this piece would create either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. What is it with some Democrats that they want to be Republicans. Let the
candidate be who he/she is. Forget the consultants, and things will be a lot better.

The problem by now is that all the wannabee strategists want to have their word and that this create a total cacophony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Did Sen. Kerry really have 29 consultants, do you know?
There were 29 people in charge of Kerry, including Kerry himself. The public heard 29 different viewpoints. The Republicans had one person in charge: Rove. The public heard one viewpoint: Rove's. Americans are used to single-minded powerful selling messages, and they like a single-minded powerful point-of-view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I know Kerry had way too many consultants. The party needed to accommodat
Edited on Sat Sep-09-06 07:37 PM by Mass
all the consultants that worked on the other campaigns.

The problem is that, at least, those consultants were working FOR the campaign. Those who were not hired by the campaign spent their time on the media criticizing what the campaign did.

There are two ways to lead a campaign:

- either the candidate is just there as a puppet and somebody from the outside pulls the strings. This is the GOP model and this is what this guy is recommending. Do we really want that? Another candidate who is not competent and who will be told what to say and what to do.

- or the candidate is in charge of his campaign and listens to other people, but makes the decision and everybody follows.

This is what we had nearly with Kerry. However, the DNC and the DLC were a little too involved in the campaign for my taste and it was sometimes a mess. One of the reason why I hope that Kerry (or Gore) is the nominee is that they now have the experience of a national campaign (in addition of a large policy experience) and can be more independent than some new candidate.

Something that this guy ignores is the need for the Democrats to auto-flagellate. As long as they will do that, what he says is useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I know they have both learned valuable lessons and agree
that would be a major plus should they be nominated again. I'm hoping...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It probably wouldn't matter
Consultants or special interests, either way the Dem Party is always going to have significant numbers of groups who need coddling and foofoo. Remember Tay's visit with the liberal diva posts?? Like that. So even if the campaign DID have one person with one message, it wouldn't matter because some Democrats somewhere would "know better" and refuse to fall in line. One only has to look at the swift boat mess to know that's true. I always had the impression that the campaign was trying to inoculate by calling out the smear tactic itself. Don't debate the truth of charges, go after the smear tactic itself and take the wind out of it that way. Regardless, we couldn't even get a handful of people right here on this board to defend Kerry 100%, there was criticisms and questions and even suspicion that the charges were true. We can never run a campaign like Republicans do because we're not Republicans. How we take our in-fighting "weakness" and turn it into a plus, that could be the beginning of a turn around as far as campaigning goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. This probably originated in a
RW meme:

The Sunday Times - Review

The Sunday Times September 10, 2006

Bush’s last stand: turning the war on its head
Andrew Sullivan
Karl Rove has a reputation as a political genius. There’s a very good argument that this is absurd. Under his guidance an incumbent war-president with a strong economy won a bare 51% of the vote against a weak opponent, and is now facing a mid-term electoral rout. But no one need doubt Rove is tough and, when necessary, scruple-free.

One of his signature methods is taking a weakness of his own candidate and proclaiming it a strength. He pulls an Orwell. So in 2004 the presidential candidate who avoided Vietnam — George Bush — ran on being a military hero and the candidate with the war medals — John Kerry — found himself trashed as a coward and a fraud.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2092-2350345,00.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Here it is:
Since I was on vacation last week, I am happy to turn over this week's column to a Madison Avenue ad-man who must remain unidentified. He has chosen to remain anonymous (due to his Republican clientele), but he has written a powerful political blueprint that I believe deserves a wider audience. He previously posted this piece as a comment on other Huffington Post blogs, but it's well worth a fresh look, even if you have read it before.

He posts here under the user name "CotyJarret," to give him what credit he is professionally able to acknowledge.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/guest-column-rules-democ_b_28937.html


This is interesting: "due to his Republican clientele."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. Created a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC