Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback: Republican praises THK on Senate floor - 2002 Heinz Awards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 02:13 PM
Original message
Flashback: Republican praises THK on Senate floor - 2002 Heinz Awards
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/R?r107:FLD001:S51414 (click on item 2)

Emphasis added -

The bold section because, I think we can see why John Kerry and Teresa are such a good fit - I think the exact same words could be said about JK as about JH.

(I am sorry I didn't know more about John Heinz before, I guess I had only been back in the region for about a year before his death, after being gone since graduating high school; but I remember my mother (living in NJ) was very upset and spoke of what a tragedy it was.)

The underlined sections - it is interesting to see the values reflected by these awards. I think libs/progressives don't know what they are talking about when they diss someone like THK, or don't give her the credit she is due.


HEINZ AWARDS -- (Senate - March 04, 2002)

GPO's PDF

---

Mr. SPECTER. Mr. President, after the sudden and untimely death of our colleague--and my friend--Senator John Heinz, in 1991, his wife, Teresa Heinz, set about devising a suitable and characteristic memorial to his memory. As she has said, such a task is especially difficult when the goal is to honor someone as complex and multi-faceted as Senator Heinz was. She realized that no static monument or self-serving exercise in sentimentality would do, and that the only tribute befitting Senator Heinz would be one that celebrated his spirit by honoring those who live and work in the same ways he did.

Those of us who had the privilege of knowing Senator Heinz remember, with respect and affection, his tremendous energy and intellectual curiosity; his commitment to improving the lives of people; and his impatience with procedural roadblocks when they stood in the way of necessary progress. For Senator Heinz, excellence was not enough; excellence was taken as a given. What made the difference was the practical--and, yes, pragmatic--application of excellence to the goal of making America a better nation and the world a better place. Although John Heinz thought and worked on a grand scale, he understood that progress is more often made in small increments: one policy, one program, even one person, at a time. We also remember the contagious enthusiasm and palpable joy with which he pursued his goals and lived his life.

Teresa Heinz created the Heinz Awards to celebrate and carry on these qualities and characteristics--five awards in each of five categories in which John was especially interested and active during his legislative and public career: Arts and Humanities; the Environment; the Human Condition; Public Policy; and Technology and the Economy. In each of these areas, the Heinz Awards recognize outstanding achievements. In fact, the annual Heinz Awards are among the largest individual achievement prizes in the world.

The six men and women who are being honored with this year's Heinz Awards--the eighth annual Awards--have just been named. They are a distinguished and accomplished group of men and women whose lives and work have truly made a difference.

This year the Arts and Humanities Heinz Award is shared by Dudley Cocke and Rick Lowe. Mr. Cocke, with his Roadside Theater company based in Whitesburg, KY, has worked in hundreds of communities in 43 States. He is a leader in the movement to cultivate locally based art all across America. Mr. Lowe is an artist and activist who founded Project Row Houses in Houston as a way to bring a world-class art project to a low-income neighborhood where such art is rarely seen and experienced.

The Heinz Award in the Environment is conferred on Dr. Jane Lubchenco. An expert in biodiversity, conservation, and global change, Dr. Lubchenco, of Oregon State University, is one of the most influential and respected voices in environmental policy.

Cushing Dolbeare receives the Heinz Award for the Human Condition. For five decades, as many members of this House well know, Ms. Dolbeare, the founder of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, has worked across party lines to make low-income housing a government priority. I am proud to say that Ms. Dolbeare is a resident of Philadelphia, PA, my home city.

The Heinz Award for Public Policy is awarded to retired Air Force General Lee Butler, of Omaha, NE. General Butler's efforts to end nuclear proliferation and change America's nuclear deterrence policy, have resulted in increased global awareness of the threat of nuclear war and nuclear weapons.

Dr. Anita Borg, of Palo Alto, California, receives the Heinz Award for Technology, the Economy and Employment. The creator of the ``Systers'' information-sharing Internet network for women, she has been in the forefront of promoting women's participation in the advancement and uses of technology, and particularly computing.

Occasionally the Heinz Awards program bestows a special honor--the Chairman's Medal--on a truly exceptional nominee whose career has been distinguished by a pattern of singular accomplishment and character. This year a Chairman's Medal has been awarded to Dr. Ruth Patrick--who is, I am again proud to say, a resident of Philadelphia, PA--who is truly a scientific pioneer. Still actively working and contributing at the age of 93, Dr. Patrick is one of the world's leading biologists and a pioneer in predicting ecosystem risks at a time before such risks were a part of general scientific knowledge. I had the opportunity to meet with her relatively recently, and she is really a dynamo at 93.

I know that every Member of this body joins me in saluting Teresa Heinz for creating such an apt and appropriate way of honoring the memory of our late colleague; and also in congratulating these distinguished Americans, recipients of the eighth annual Heinz Awards, for the way their lives and contributions have--and continue to--carry on the spirit and the work of Senator John Heinz, and have helped to make America, and the world, truly a better place for all of us.

I yield the floor.


I was kind of surprised to find this in the CR - I stumbled across it when looking for something else entirely - and just thought it was interesting enough to post. (And people say the Senate is boring. Pshaw.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent find! Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Foxie brings smear back into focus, and reminds me of THK's defense of Murtha
(JK entered her op-ed into the CR):

Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, one of the reasons I love and respect my wife Teresa Heinz Kerry so very much is because she has always maintained the strength of her convictions. She speaks her mind, and she speaks the truth. I am especially proud of her passionate defense of her fellow Pennsylvanian--the decorated veteran and respected military expert, Representative JACK MURTHA. In a recent essay, Teresa's powerful words spoke of JACK MURTHA's courage and integrity rose above the disparaging and unconscionable words of those who smeared him. As I read what she wrote, I realized why this issue had struck such a chord with her--and why she was able to speak with such incredible clarity--because, as someone who grew up under a dictatorship, Teresa believes deeply in the freedom of every American to speak their mind without fear of condemnation.

The characteristics we all admire in Representative Murtha--honesty, compassion, strength and patriotism--are the characteristics that make Teresa such an incredible citizen. I am glad she spoke out, and for that reason, I ask that her words be printed in the RECORD.

There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows:

(From CNHI News Service)
(By Teresa Heinz Kerry)

Assault on Murtha Should Alarm Us All

``Because we in Congress are charged with sending our sons and daughters into battle, it is our responsibility, our obligation, to speak out for them. That's why I am speaking out.''

U.S. Rep. John Murtha, Nov. 17, ``War In Iraq.''

U.S. Rep. John Murtha completely changed the public debate in our country by calling for an immediate redeployment of our troops in Iraq. Whether you agree or disagree with his specific proposal is not the point--but his critics' words demand a response. Murtha speaks with special authority.

His national security credentials are impeccable. His patriotism is unwavering. His influence on national defense is unsurpassed. None in Congress spends as much time as Murtha with the wounded from the Iraq war. His voice on matters of national defense deserves--indeed, commands--great respect. This is why his political opponents think him so dangerous. The orchestrated assault on Murtha should alarm us all. Just when you thought the debate could sink no lower, the politicians committed to staying the course in Iraq turned the fire hoses of smear and intimidation on this icon of national security. Listen to what they said:

They said he had given aid and comfort to the enemy. They accused him of abandoning the troops. And one rookie representative, the most junior member in the House, so lost any decency or sense of decorum that she called Murtha a coward.

I think they smeared the wrong representative. Murtha's history is one of heroism and leadership. He served in the Marine Corps from 1952 to 1955. He served as a Marine Corps drill instructor and a reservist. He re-upped so he could serve in Vietnam. He was wounded twice while serving as a Marine intelligence officer, and then went back into the reserves from 1967 to 1990. He was the first Vietnam veteran elected to the Congress, where he has served with honor and distinction as a bipartisan advocate of national defense ever since.

How bipartisan? When President Reagan wanted to build the MX missile, Murtha broke with his party to fight for what Reagan called the ``peacekeeper.'' Reagan sent him to El Salvador and the Philippines as an election observer and, as an official representative of the United States, to Pakistan to attend President Zia's funeral. When President George H.W. Bush said of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, ``this will not stand,'' Murtha stood with him and voted to use military force to drive Iraq out.

His credentials on national defense are unimpeachable. He has been named Minuteman of the Year by the Reserve Officers Association of the United States. He has been honored by the Blinded American Veterans Foundation. He is a winner of the Henry M. Jackson Distinguished Service Award, and an honoree of the Association of the United States Army. When Murtha received the distinguished public service award from the American Legion, he was praised by the national commander as a veteran, supporter of a strong national defense and holder of an outstanding track record on veterans' issues.

That is Jack Murtha's history, and the summer soldiers and the sunshine patriots who attack him cannot rewrite it. That's why they resort instead to the most reprehensible type of personal attacks. We've seen this before. I know and love another Vietnam veteran who served our country with distinction and honor--who suffered the slings and arrows of distortions, half-truths and falsehoods.

Scoundrels who would stifle debate and smear dissenters weaken our democracy and diminish our Nation's ability to make decisions and change course when circumstances demand.

This war is hard--hard to win, hard to support, and for most, hard to figure out. We all want the best for our troops, our country, the Iraqi people and what is best for the Middle East. Much is at stake.

But if we want the best outcome, the best minds we have must be free to express their strongest beliefs and best advice. Murtha has earned our respect. His right to speak out is an intrinsic component of our democracy. It should be honored--we should hold that right sacred--even if his words deviate from the party line, the president's talking points, or public opinion.

I think Murtha did our country an enormous public service for speaking out as he did, and I support for him for exercising his right. A courageous person is always to be admired.

link



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Aww, the first paragraph
I miss Momma T. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Thanks, this is really great.
I remember that happening now.

What JK says about Teresa is so wonderful. I like how he uses his two "most important words in the American language" to describe her - love, and citizen. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. THK testimony (1999): Oversight Hearing on Pension Issues
Statement of Teresa Heinz, Chairman, Heinz Family Philanthropies

Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Oversight,
of the House Committee on Ways and Means

Oversight Hearing on Pension Issues

March 23, 1999

Chairman Houghton, Congressman Coyne and members of the subcommittee, I am delighted to be here today to talk about the importance of women in the context of the overall Congressional discussion of the future of pension policy in America. Let me state from the outset that resolution of this nation's retirement policy, or the lack of one, is of paramount importance for all, but most especially if we are to combat the growing problem of poverty in old age being distinctly female. The Heinz Family Philanthropies are committed to ensuring that women have the information and skills needed to surmount the overwhelming challenges to secure retirement income. In 1996, the Foundation launched the Women's Institute for Secure Retirement (WISER) to implement these goals.

The reality of today is that most Americans, regardless of their gender, are ill-prepared for their retirement. The fate that awaits most women, however, is by far the more troublesome problem. Of the 63 million baby-boomers in America, fully 32 million are saving less than one-third of what they will need for retirement - and the overwhelming majority of those unprepared for retirement are women.

Today, women earn, on average, 74 cents for every dollar earned by men which creates less of an opportunity for retirement savings. Nearly, three-fourths of full-time working women earn less than $30,000, in fact their median income is only $21,883. Of course, the numbers are even worse for minority women, where half of all African American women earn less than $19,741 and for Hispanic women it's only $15,967.

Women are at a structural disadvantage too. Their work patterns provide them with fewer pensions and less time to accumulate savings through their workplace, yet they need more income because they live longer. Currently, 40 percent of all women's jobs are now non-standard. These non-standard jobs are part-time, contract, freelance and are often combined to create one full-time job. Moreover, more and more employers are incentivizing non-standard work by offering permanent part-time positions -- guaranteed part-time jobs with no benefits. These non-standard jobs also mean lower wages, fewer if any employee benefits, and more often than not, no company pension plan.

In spite of work outside the home, women have not been relieved of their responsibilities as family caregivers. In addition to the time women are home on maternity leave, they also bear the primary responsibilities of caring for an ill child or sick relative resulting in diminished job tenures. These shorter careers can have serious repercussions at retirement because fewer years of work and/or breaks in employment affect eligibility and lower benefits under employer pensions and Social Security. The data shows that women, on average, spend almost 15 % of their working years out of the job market, while men miss out on less than 2 % of their working years.

As a result of a woman's dual burden of caring for her family and working outside of the home, the majority of working women are generally disadvantaged in their knowledge of pensions and investments. Nearly 40% of women are dependent on Social Security for almost all of their income because they have had fewer opportunities to participate in the retirement plans provided by employers.

The combination of lower income, and fewer pension opportunities as well as less knowledge means that women get lower returns on investments when they are able to save. They are more likely to choose lower risk, lower return vehicles. Women are more likely than men to have money in a regular savings or money market account, life insurance, and U.S. Savings Bonds. Men are more likely than women to have money in mutual funds, real estate, and 401(k)s.

Mr. Chairman, while we applaud this committee for allowing us to focus attention on the ways in which the system's current inadequacies affect working women, expanding savings opportunities may not have much effect on the women we should be most concerned about -- most working women are struggling from paycheck to paycheck, juggling their finances to find the income to contribute to their 401(k) savings plans. And, Mr. Chairman, research from the Heinz Foundation/Sun America 1998 National Women's Retirement Survey found that 61% of women reported that they usually have little to no money left after paying bills to save for retirement. For African-American and Hispanic women this problem is even more pronounced -- 75% of African American women and 69% of Hispanic women reported no money left for retirement savings.

The Comprehensive Retirement Security and Pension Reform Act of 1999 introduced by Congressmen Portman and Cardin contains several provisions that will help women. This is particularly important given that only 20% of small businesses offer retirement plans. First and foremost the legislation contains provisions that will make it easier for small businesses to offer pension plans. Second, the legislation requires accelerated vesting in three years instead of five years for employer matching contributions in 401(k) plans. Finally, the legislation provisions makes pension portability easier.

However, in whatever pension reforms the Congress ultimately considers, we have got to be clear about who will benefit from these reforms.

If this Congress and this Administration are truly committed to reducing and ultimately wiping out the fact that the face of poverty in old age is distinctly female, then hearings like this one become increasingly important. But, if this issue continues to be politicized, and ultimately no action is taken, I hope we will see a ground swell of women voting -- some for the first time -- saying we won't take it anymore!

Mr. Chairman, no one -- Republican or Democrat -- wants to take the voting power of women for granted. Economic security is an issue that women think, care and vote about. It's up to all of us to give them good choices.

link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Jeffrey Lewis testimony (1998): Hearing on Oversight of Various Pension Issues
Edited on Sat Mar-03-07 04:53 PM by ProSense
Statement of Jeffrey Lewis, Executive Director
Teresa and H. John Heinz III Foundation

Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Oversight
of the House Committee on Ways and Means

Hearing on Oversight of Various Pension Issues

May 5, 1998

Madam chairman, Congressman Coyne, Congressman Portman, members of the Subcommittee, I am Jeffrey Lewis, Executive Director of the Teresa and H. John Heinz III Foundation.

As you may be aware, I was the Republican Staff Director to the late U.S. Senator John Heinz, a Senator devoted to retirement issues and who, up and until the day he was tragically killed, was working on pension legislation. I know if he were alive today, he would be in the thick of the discussion on Social Security reform as well as the challenges of improving the private pension system.

Teresa Heinz, Chairman of the Heinz Philanthropies has made it her mission to ensure that part of the foundation's focus would be to finish some of the visionary work with which the late Senator was involved.

I deeply appreciate the opportunity to be here this afternoon to discuss the results of a national poll that we recently completed. During the past several months, the Heinz Foundation joined with SunAmerica Corporation to undertake an historic, National Women's Retirement Survey, for the Women's Institute for a Secure Retirement. The objective of the poll was to target women aged 25-55 to better understand what women in and outside the workplace were doing to prepare for retirement, and how they personally address these issues. A total of 1,858 people were interviewed and we over-sampled for African-American and Hispanic American women and men.

Eye-Opening Results:

Although most Americans would ideally like to retire early most know realistically they will have no choice but to work at least until they are age 65. In fact, for one half of Americans aged 25 to 55 there may be no such thing as retirement as we know it. Nearly half of all respondents say they expect to have to take on a full-time or part-time job after they "retire" in order to support themselves.

The general polling results underscore the fact that Americans share a fear about the financial survival of Social Security. However, our findings point to a much larger and more troubling problem that we are facing, in America today, a pension crisis - a crisis of far too many low income Americans particularly African-American and Hispanic Americans working in settings where pensions simply are not offered; and who are financially unable to participate in pension plans if they are offered and they are not making enough to save on their own.

We believe we have done something very different in undertaking this poll, that is, our goal was, in particular, to begin to understand what African-Americans and Hispanic Americans are and are not doing with regard to savings and pensions issues generally. While I will be happy to respond to questions about the specifics of the poll, my testimony today will focus specifically on what we found among African-Americans and Hispanic Americans, both men and women.

What we found was a race to the bottom

Let me share some of the highlights that examine these issues:

1. No money for retirement:

75% of African-American women and 69% of Hispanic women report that they usually have little or no money left after paying their bills to save for retirement;

1. Fear they won't have enough money to live on:

71% of African-American women and 59% of Hispanic women are concerned that they simply will not have enough money on which to live when and if they retire.

1. No real retirement:

While many in Congress, the Administration and the news media have and continue to debate the issue of raising the retirement age for purposes of eligibility for Social Security, for many African-American and Hispanic American women, this is a non-issue! 60% of African-American and 57% of Hispanic women expect to have to continue to work at a part-time or full-time job after retirement simply to survive. For them, there will be no retirement because they fear that they will not have saved enough money to live on.

Madam Chairman, minority women are bereft of optimism, short on finances and increasingly inclined to believe that they will never have the power to control their financial destinies. Since they barely have enough money to make ends meet while they are working, they cannot fathom a time in the future when they will not be working. They fear that retirement, for them, will represent a financial prison because so many -- 57% of African-American and 54% of Hispanic women fear they will live at or near the poverty level after working long and hard throughout their lives. If these trends continue, not only will poverty in old-age continue to have a distinctly feminine face, but the feminization of poverty will have gained a greater stranglehold on women in general and minority women in particular.

link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Hmmm, Pensions. Interesting.
Washington, DC – U.S. Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa),
Chairman and Ranking Republican of the Senate Finance Committee, today announced the
formation of a new Finance subcommittee on Energy, Natural Resources and Infrastructure, and
the addition of pensions issues to an expanded Social Security, Pensions, and Family Policy
panel.
The Subcommittee on International Trade will also address global competitiveness, and
the panel on Taxation and IRS Oversight will take an active look at long-term growth. The
Subcommittee on Health Care will continue to examine policy across the health care system. The
full Finance Committee is expected to vote shortly to finalize the subcommittees as slated.

“I want the Finance Committee to play an active role in improving America’s energy
independence. The full committee will be very active on energy, but our new subcommittee
will really focus and sharpen these efforts. I also want to ramp up our work for retirees and
families,” said Baucus. “Our subcommittees will take a new look at issues of long-term
growth and global competitiveness – and Senator Lincoln will become the first female
Democratic Senator to lead a Finance Subcommittee. I know our subcommittee leaders will
work together to hold constructive hearings to examine these important issues.”

Grassley said, “It makes sense to evaluate the subcommittees from time to time and make
sure they’re best configured to help the committee advance good policy. Further
highlighting issues such as energy, infrastructure, and pensions reflects what have been and
continue to be high priorities for what I call the ‘quality of life committee’ because of our
focus on bread-and-butter issues.”

Subcommittee on Social Security, Pensions, and Family Policy
Senator John Kerry, Chairman
Senator John Rockefeller
Senator Kent Conrad
Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Jim Bunning, Ranking Member
Senator Trent Lott
Senator Jon Kyl

http://www.senate.gov/~finance/press/Bpress/2007press/prb022807a.pdf


Interesting. Must make for good dinner table conversation sometimes.

I wonder if there is a chance that the lovely and talented THK could ever testify in front of a Finance Committee about women and pension issues. MEthinks she would get an attentive reception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. THK has done a lot of work on women's retirement issues
She wrote the foreword to The Pension Book (originally titled "Pensions in Crisis") that was put out in 1996 by the Pension Rights Center. The Heinz Foundation helped fund the work that went into the book. According to the HFP website, that then spurred them to start a program called the "Women's Retirement Initiative." Jeff Lewis has also done a lot of work on this subject, and especially social security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Back to the environment: Heinz Endowment activities, THK quotes
from 1997:

The forest certification process was completed at no cost to the Commonwealth. The Heinz Endowments, based in Pittsburgh, provided the Gifford Pinchot Institute for Conservation -- a nonprofit organization committed to forest conservation policy -- with a grant to finance Pennsylvania's certification process as a case study for the rest of nation. The Heinz Endowments will fund the study of the remaining public forest land.

"This was one of the largest certification efforts ever undertaken, and we're very pleased to have sponsored it," said Teresa Heinz, chairperson of the Howard Heinz Endowments. "Now that over one million acres have been given this environmental seal of approval, we look forward to working with the state to certify the remaining public forest lands in Pennsylvania and create a model of forest management that public and private landowners elsewhere will be able to adopt."

link


Other groups have come forward to help fund the program, such as the Howard Heinz Endowment, which will provide up to $35,000 through the Western Pennsylvania Watershed Protection Program administered by the Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania.

"Pennsylvania is home to more miles of rivers and streams than any other state except Alaska, and the Heinz Endowments seek to preserve our state's unique freshwater heritage," said Teresa Heinz, chairman of the board of the Howard Heinz Endowment. "It is our hope that the Coldwater Heritage Partnership grants will stimulate long-term planning to preserve and expand Pennsylvania's coldwater fisheries and restore and protect these priceless ecosystems."

link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a treasure she is, beyond smart, so visionary and humane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. What great finds from you and Prosense
They all speak to the hypocrisy of the Republicans. Teresa is such an incredibly accomplished intelligent woman who is also an incredibly nice person. I remember Senator Heinz very vaguely.

He does sound very much like Senator Kerry. He also would have been forced out of the Republican party.

I didn't know that Kerry had put Teresa's powerful defense of Murtha in the Senate record. His comments were great too. (In fact, between his comments and her op-ed both Kerry's speak of loving each other. I wonder if this is unique in the Seante record.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC