Can AP do any more loaded than that? It basically puts the liar (Fox) and the victim (Kerry) at the same level. The article certainly does not give us any clue on how the Democrats will vote, but it certainly is very nice with Fox.
Standoff continues between Kerry, Fox over ambassador postSAM HANANEL
Associated Press
WASHINGTON - The standoff between Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., and GOP mega-donor Sam Fox, of St. Louis, remains unresolved as a Senate panel prepares to vote this week on Fox's nomination to be ambassador to Belgium.
...
In a series of written responses to questions posed by Kerry after the Feb. 27 hearing, Fox has continued to deny knowing how the Swift Boat group would use his money. That hasn't satisfied Kerry and could pose problems for Fox if he convinces other Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to scuttle the nomination.
"Sen. Kerry and other members of the committee still have questions for Mr. Fox, and it's fair to say the concerns raised during the February 27 hearing haven't vanished," Kerry spokeswoman Amy Brundage said Monday.
...
Among the written follow-up questions Kerry posed to Fox earlier this month: "At the time of your donation, what was your understanding as to what your money would be used for? What did you understand SBVT's purpose at that time to be?"
Fox's answer:
"I assumed that my contribution would be used for SBVT's general purposes including administrative expenses, fund raising, advertising, but did not have any understanding whatever as to how my contribution would be spent."
When Kerry asked if Fox received any acknowledgment for his contribution, Fox initially replied that he hadn't. Fox later resubmitted his answer, stating, "After my assistant checked my records, we found the attached acknowledgment of my contribution."
A letter from the Swift Boat treasurer thanking Fox for his $50,000 contribution said, "The only way we can get the truth out about John Kerry is with the help of Americans such as you."
...
Representatives for Obama, Dodd and Biden did not return calls seeking comment on Monday.
It can be risky to seek political payback against a diplomatic nominee, said Ross Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University.
"There is the tit-for-tat problem that you let that genie out of the bottle and it's likely to come back and bedevil a Democratic president," Baker said.
...