This is incredibly significant as it means that there is a real possibility of ratifying whatever comes out of Copenhagen. Ratifying a treaty needs 67 votes. Passing the legislation is more important, but that passing the treaty is becoming "thinkable" is amazing.
Here's the good news for climate advocates: E&E now finds that at least 67 senators are in play on the issue, enough not only to pass the climate bill but also to ratify an international treaty should sponsors actually run the boards and not lose a single member.
For starters, the bill's lead sponsors, Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), can safely rely on 31 "yes" votes as they work on building their coalition. That list includes Ben Cardin of Maryland, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and Tom Udall of New Mexico. All appeared at a Capitol Hill campaign-style rally last month during the public unveiling of the legislation, S. 1733 (pdf).
Another 12 senators fall into the "probably yes" camp, from Michael Bennet of Colorado to Al Franken of Minnesota and Mark Warner of Virginia. Bennet and Warner are not slam dunks given the fossil fuel interests in their home states, while Franken dropped off the "yes" list when he signed a letter with nine other Democrats in August that raised concerns about President Obama's stance against trade sanctions on carbon-intensive goods from developing countries that do not have strong enough climate policies (E&ENews PM, Aug. 6).
As for the fence sitters, the list continues to swell from both directions as key senators hedge their bets.
The article starts from a less positive perspective, but considering that a month ago, there was talk that Reid would not put it on the calendar and that it simply would not happen this year, this is amazing progress.
http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/10/20/20climatewire-on-road-to-60-votes-for-climate-bill-senate-43836.htmlPosted in DU, where it will sink.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8707855