has tweeted the WaPo story)
http://www.boston.com/business/healthcare/articles/2009/09/25/plan_to_fund_health_overhaul_could_cost_mass_medical_device_makers_jobs/Medical gear makers howl at push for tax
Say plan to fund health bill could cost jobs in Mass.
By Robert Weisman
A plan to tax makers of medical devices to help pay for an overhaul of the nation’s health care system is raising alarms in Massachusetts, where device companies say the estimated $400 million they would have to pay could force them to cut jobs and reduce research.
The proposed tax is included in the health care bill being debated and amended by the Senate Finance Committee this week. That bill, expected to be the principal vehicle for the final health care overhaul plan that will go before Congress, could be reported out of committee as early as today.
State industry leaders, including heavyweights such as Boston Scientific Corp., of Natick, and Covidien, of Mansfield, have been lobbying to get the tax deleted from the bill introduced by Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana, who chairs the finance panel. Manufacturers argue it could cripple innovation in a sector that includes 225 companies with a total of 20,000 employees in Massachusetts.
I just replied via Twitter to Wonk Room with this article. Sorry, but 20,000 jobs is a lot, and seems the likely reason Kerry opposed it. I don't think your defense on THK's money going to the Heinz sons will fly, though, and suggest you drop it. She is John Kerry's wife, so presumably he is biased in her affairs going well. But truth be known that these are jobs in MA we are talking about. That has to be Sen. Kerry's #1 priority right now. He served his constituents well here. Too bad people will read the WaPo article and think the opposite. The WaPo should have at least aired a variety of theories instead of only the money one. I really think that short a smoking gun journalists should not do this trick of showing the money but not giving any other possible reason of why a Senator or Congressman would have a certain position.
I do agree with them in the article, though, that this kind of information should come out faster and be on line immediately. This is the price one pays for running for office.