Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry, Clinton rally for Coakley today?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
ObamaKerryDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 03:56 PM
Original message
Kerry, Clinton rally for Coakley today?
Does anyone know when it will be on or where online (if anywhere) it can be watched? I tried C-span around the time it was supposed to happen (2 pm ET I believe) but it was nowhere to be found. Apparently there wasn't a live feed?

Really want to see it though! :)
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. The rally in Boston is finsihed, The one in Worcester is at 4:30, with Clinton and McGovern
I don't think any of them is on line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I looked too - with similarly no success
I am actually surprised that Clinton is there given his role on Haiti. I figured he would tape a message that could be played at the rallies. I hope that like with the Kerry town hall there will be a recording later.

It is amazing that the Boston media did not cover the rally given that Clinton was there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Luftmensch067 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wish it were amazing, instead of NORMAL!!!!
Still, we should all keep our eyes on the NECN website...they're my guess, if *anyone* were to cover it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ObamaKerryDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm surprised too, though I suppose I shouldn't be..
given that airing such a rally probably wouldn't work into the media's current narrative about this race, which of course is doom and gloom for Dems. :thumbsdown: Their MO here is so obvious. If they were to show the Dem ahead in most of the polls, then there wouldn't be a story..


I hope they at least show it on C-span later!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. AP report - 1500 people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ObamaKerryDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks for the article! :) Clinton made some really good points here.
Edited on Fri Jan-15-10 04:47 PM by ObamaKerryDem
I wonder what JK said?

Sounds like a good turnout. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Especially as opposed to the Brown/Giuliani rally
in the North End (Boston's Italian neighborhood) which drew, http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/giuliani_leads.html">apparently, "A feisty crowd of several hundred."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, and wait until we get the numbers for how many show up to see the POTUS.
I do think Coakley will win, but it will require work by Democrats in the next days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ObamaKerryDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Haha! :D
Edited on Fri Jan-15-10 05:34 PM by ObamaKerryDem
"several hundred" < 1,500


Fail for them, win for us. :D

Now let's hope they all (that 1,500) get themselves and their friends, family, and neighbors to the polls on Tuesday! *crosses fingers*

We have to win this one....we can't not!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MonteLukast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. OMG, Giuliani actually showed up?
Please please please say he was wearing his Yankees hat... :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. More here
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/15/bill-clinton-rallies-with-coakley/

Former President Bill Clinton, along with a veritable Who’s-who of Massachusetts Democrats rallied about 750 supporters at a Boston hotel Friday afternoon, urging them to get out the vote amid signs that the race for the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s seat is too close to call.“You have to decide if you want us to be a tomorrow country or a yesterday country,” Mr. Clinton said told the cheering crowd of about 750 in the ornate ballroom of the Copley Square Hotel in Boston. “Do you really want to put Massachusetts, which gave birth to accountable government in this country and stood up against the abuse of power, in the hands of power abusers?”

Sen. John F. Kerry reiterated that the election will have national implications, perhaps alluding to the fact that Ms. Coakley’s opponent, Scott Brown, has already vowed to become the 41st vote in the Senate against the Democrats’ health care overhaul were he to win.

“The voting here is going to determine the balance of power in America, and with it is going to determine the fate of what we started with Barack Obama a little over a year ago,” Mr. Kerry said.
...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nice pictures and comments from Duer Graywarrior who went
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MonteLukast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. I loved that link.
Really made me feel like I was there. And made me really, REALLY like Kerry, Coakley, and everyone else involved.

How long till this rally goes up on YouTube?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ObamaKerryDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Great thread--and pics! Lucky Graywarrior :)
Edited on Sat Jan-16-10 05:17 PM by ObamaKerryDem
And yes, Kerry is very funny. Does anyone here remember his appearance on Letterman from back during the '04 campaign? I still have the tape I made of it then (which I happened to come across again just recently, when I was back at my old house) . He was hilarious! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. I like this paragraph from the NYTimes
The contrast tells it all. Sure, some of these people came for Clinton, but this shows the strength of the two operations.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/16/us/politics/16massachusetts.html

Mr. Brown appeared in Boston with former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York, and Ms. Coakley spoke at packed rallies in Boston and Worcester featuring former President Bill Clinton, Senator John F. Kerry and Gov. Deval Patrick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. There also is SPOKE vs APPEARED
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I just crossed the state from east to west this morning
(weekly visit to inlaws' house while she is in AZ for the winter).

I dont see the excitement for Brown that I hear in the media. While there has been a clear uptick of signs in the Western part of the state for him, it is not very different from what I see on normal election years. Democrats are always very lethargic, so there are few Coakley signs, but there were few Kerry signs in 2008 (in fact, you could have thought O' Reilly would have won the primary, if signs meant something), so it is very difficult to judge whether there is really an interest in Brown or simply if there is an excitement level among some people that make them answer to polls while other people are too busy with their regular life to be bothered answering. I just cant judge anymore.

Longmeadow, who is typically Republican, has no more GOP signs than usual. In my own town in the east, there is no signs for anybody. The Suffolk poll seams to suggest there is some excitement in the south east (which would explain why they have so many people in the sample from there), but what does it mean when it comes to Tuesday?

I cant say anymore and I think that nobody can say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. That is interesting
You wonder if part of the excitement is that media somewhat fanned the small, but unusual early enthusiasm among the tea baggers. They have been pushing the idea that the tea baggers are a huge movement since summer. There is genuine anger and concern over jobs and the future. (In retrospect, more money should have been in the state money and immediate projects in the stimulus and Obama should have made what was done more prominent - the economy is beginning to revive, but people are not tying it to the stimulus.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I dont think there is a lot of doubt that this is what is happening.
Edited on Sat Jan-16-10 11:20 AM by Mass
The first Rasmussen poll had Coakley at +9 before the campaign really started (I mean in early January)

Since then, we had both the media fawning on Scott Brown for obvious business reasons (see my comments on polls in another thread) and Democrats started to melt, once again more busy bashing their own candidates in order to get off the hook in case of a defeat than making her case. (see a certain post in GDP).

All this created a situation that is worse than it should be (even with Coakley's style and the economic difficulties). And teabaggers felt encouraged to answer polls.

I just hope this does not kill us at the end. As I said, I dont know anymore, but I am disgusted both by the media and the Democrats at a leadership and advisers level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. There has to be some way to hold the media accountable
They are actively engaged in influencing an election here! It's irresponsible at best,if they have no ulterior motive other than ratings, and illegal at worst, if they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think there must be a need for accountability at several levels.
Edited on Sat Jan-16-10 01:46 PM by Mass
I am sorry, but this screams both desperate and out of touch. If low-income women are the target, I am sure there are a lot of things in Brown record to contrast to Coakley record concerning that. But this ? I hope they polled that the charge was working on their target, because for me, it does not do it, far from it.

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/senate-republicans/dem-mail-scott-brown-wants-hospitals-to-turn-away-all-rape-victims/

Why did they not go with the bank tax?

I hope I am wrong and it will not rebound, but I am less than impressed by the local party in this election (starting by her, but not only).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. It *is* desperate, and will backfire on the Coakley campaign
Let's hope there isn't enough time left for Brown to use it against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. I suggest we point it out to every Democrat and even minded independant.
I googled Coakley and all I got back was Boston Herald posts and RW crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ladym55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Amen to that
I am so frustrated at this point. It has gotten to be really hard work to find any real news sources anywhere.

M$M just spins and spins without any accountability. Faux Noise sets the stage and the rest of the stooges follow along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Try googling Coakley. All you get is Herald posts and RW links.
It is obvious what is going on here. And, I hope this energizes Democrats, and independants see through this push for Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ObamaKerryDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. Very good point. :D
Edited on Sat Jan-16-10 05:20 PM by ObamaKerryDem
Shows Coakley (like JK, Clinton, Obama and others) has substance while Brown (like Palin, Bush, and the like) is all flash and hype. I would hope the people of MA would want more from their new Senator than just to "appear"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MonteLukast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. Very nice new diary on DailyKos
Front page, recommended

She was great. She was warm. She spent the first ten minutes talking about our better natures and how we have to help our neighbors in Haiti. She talked about the stark differences between her positions with Scott Brown and took no cheap shots at him at all.

She was aggressive, passionate, inspiring and most of all, portrayed herself as someone unafraid to roll up her sleeves and do the hard work.

I appreciate that, and I believe it.

I might share a knuckle sandwich with the next clown who says "pinch your nose and vote for Coakley."


Eat that, Chuck Todd. You can keep the vapid and pretty ones who tug at your shallow heartstrings. We'll elect someone who actually gets stuff DONE... thereby, warming OUR hearts knowing we've got a Senator who will actually work for us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Very nice diary
Here is a fantastic comment that really puts some of the attacks on Coakley in perspective, even though I do not think there is any reason to assume that she will be as good a politician or Senator as Kerry. (It is a wonderful comment on Kerry)
{div class = "excerpt"]
Reposting a comment I made last night



I don't know Coakley too well.

But I do know John Kerry, and a lot of the stuff that's being said about Coakley sounds like what has been said about Kerry in the past -- cold, flat, too conservative, lazy campaigner, etc...

And in the case of Kerry I think it's nonsense. I probably know Kerry better than any politician out there -- I know close friends of his, and he's the real deal. He's extremely caring, thoughtful, hard-working and yes, progressive.

So forgive me if I'm not so receptive to Coakley's critics.

What I do know about Coakley is that her votes in the senate could make a very real difference to people's lives.



http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2010/1/16/121818/978/43#43
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. The only things Republicans say yes to are Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Tea Partiers, and Fox News
According to a DUer in GD, this is what Kerry said at the rally yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. That's a good line & 100% true. Republicans should not be rewarded
for completely withdrawing from doing the people's work. Democrats never stopped trying when they were in the minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ObamaKerryDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. *High five for JK*So totally on point!
Edited on Sat Jan-16-10 05:14 PM by ObamaKerryDem
See, things like this are precisely why I'm such a big supporter of John Kerry's--he gets it. :D

And I think the more Republicans are (by virtue of their own damn fault, of not only not much more widely rejecting loons like Limbaugh but often embracing or bowing down to him at most every turn) tied with Limbaugh and the ilk, the longer they will stay on the sidelines. Certainly having been endorsed by the likes of Limbaugh will not help Brown out much in a state like MA? If it does, that's a turn around to say the least...and in a far from good way. But I'm just not buying that that many voters in a state as seemingly blue as MA just woke up one day and decided to be more like tea partiers..at least not virtually overnight, like these outlier polls appear to suggest. I just don't buy that at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. A clip
posted here


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC