|
Edited on Sun Jan-31-10 07:57 PM by karynnj
The purpose of this forum is sharing information on John Kerry and discussing it. When you've done that, I have never seen anyone take offense to anything. But, as one who has commented on some of your comments on the bigger forums, I think I need to explain that disagreeing with a POV or conjecture, is not personal.
I actually, at several points, wished I had the relationship to reach out to the many sweet, sincere Edwards' supporters ( as opposed to many nasty ones who were the worst on this board in attacking JK unfairly) in this long saga. I can understand, how for many, it is hard to realize that they were deceived and to surrender the beautiful, comforting picture they had of the Edwards' family and of his goal of helping the poor. They also had a huge amount of themselves invested in the Edwards campaign.
I never really liked Edwards, but it hurts to think what Emma Claire and Jack are going through at very vulnerable young ages in a world where kids their age are proficient on the internet. Although it overstates it, it is hard not to think of the Book of Job, when thinking of Elizabeth - she has had so many things she valued most taken from her - a son, her health, her marriage, and now, her reputation. (Now there were some high points in between - ie being tapped as the "second family".)
I think with any public person, we need to remember that, though we might know more "facts" about the life of some politician than we do of a sibling, we do not know them. Most of what we know is what they want us to know. I think the web, with it's abundance of instantly available pictures, tapes, and personal stories, aggravates this. I remember reading an interview of Paul McCartney, where he spoke of some fans knowing more about his "life" than he did. Now, obviously on a real level, that was not true - but there likely were fans, who could recite all the public details better - but who, of course, didn't really know him.
We can and should respect public figures, who do good things, but we have to remember that they are people and, for the most part, their private life should be private.
|