Kerry and Romney have little in common except central-casting presidential jawlines. In 2004, Kerry inartfully and too memorably said he voted for $87 billion supplemental appropriation for operations in Iraq before voting against it. It was a self-inflicted wound, the memorable trigger for an instant and persistent attack. But it was no flip-flop. Kerry had voted to fund the money so long as Republicans paid for it by rescinding one one-hundredth of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. The flip-flop attacks on Kerry’s record were all like this, based on distortions like Senate votes stripped of context. They had to be, because Kerry’s real record is a lifetime of consistency.
But consistency and Romney don’t belong in the same sentence. That’s why using the Bush-Cheney playbook against him isn’t just an insult to Kerry; it’s an insult to flip-flopping. Romney isn’t a flip-flopper; he’s a shape-shifter.
In contrast, Kerry’s principled record reaches all the way back to his call to end the Vietnam War, an act of moral clarity summed up in a compelling challenge still quoted today: “How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?’’
The only pearl of moral wisdom Romney has offered thus far came in a recent debate: “I’m running for office, for Pete’s sake, I can’t have illegals!’’
http://bostonglobe.com/opinion/2011/11/23/not-flip-flopper-shape-shifter/KQazVVi6dH67JSPWqcVcoK/story.htmlThis is wonderful and says what we have all said. Shrum is incredibly well positioned to speak on this because he was a senior strategist and media adviser in both the 2004 Kerry campaign and the 1994 Romney/Kennedy Senate race.