Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fantatstic Bob Shrum defense of Kerry and attack on Romney, not as flip flopper, but shapeshifter!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 08:55 AM
Original message
Fantatstic Bob Shrum defense of Kerry and attack on Romney, not as flip flopper, but shapeshifter!
Edited on Wed Nov-23-11 08:57 AM by karynnj

Kerry and Romney have little in common except central-casting presidential jawlines. In 2004, Kerry inartfully and too memorably said he voted for $87 billion supplemental appropriation for operations in Iraq before voting against it. It was a self-inflicted wound, the memorable trigger for an instant and persistent attack. But it was no flip-flop. Kerry had voted to fund the money so long as Republicans paid for it by rescinding one one-hundredth of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. The flip-flop attacks on Kerry’s record were all like this, based on distortions like Senate votes stripped of context. They had to be, because Kerry’s real record is a lifetime of consistency.

But consistency and Romney don’t belong in the same sentence. That’s why using the Bush-Cheney playbook against him isn’t just an insult to Kerry; it’s an insult to flip-flopping. Romney isn’t a flip-flopper; he’s a shape-shifter.

In contrast, Kerry’s principled record reaches all the way back to his call to end the Vietnam War, an act of moral clarity summed up in a compelling challenge still quoted today: “How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?’’

The only pearl of moral wisdom Romney has offered thus far came in a recent debate: “I’m running for office, for Pete’s sake, I can’t have illegals!’’

http://bostonglobe.com/opinion/2011/11/23/not-flip-flopper-shape-shifter/KQazVVi6dH67JSPWqcVcoK/story.html

This is wonderful and says what we have all said. Shrum is incredibly well positioned to speak on this because he was a senior strategist and media adviser in both the 2004 Kerry campaign and the 1994 Romney/Kennedy Senate race.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Luftmensch067 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is a brilliant piece of writing
And shows why Shrum was thought the best strategist for the campaign in 2004. Unfortunately, he has only thought of the masterful phrase "a lifetime of consistency" in 2011. That should have been their mantra!

But I agree -- this is wonderful, not only as an ironclad defence of JK, but as an indictment of Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Great point - "a life time of consistancy"
I suspect that in the heat of the campaign they did not anticipate the flip flop charge getting traction until it was too late. (Dean had used it in the primaries and it completely flopped.)

The reason it would have been so good is that it works on nearly every issue. It is amazing that his Yale 1966 foreign policy speech (that Madeline Albright excerpts in a book she wrote in 2006) as themes that are consistent with Kerry 2011! That is consistency for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC