I'm going to get flamed for posting this in G.D. but its the newest info about the "lawsuits". Any helpers? This came from a very reliable source!
Kerry conceded because he lost the popular vote, and with that, the ability to legitimately/politically ask for an immediate recount.
He never intended to NOT investigate the vote, particularly in Ohio. But I saw the email from his campaign manager in Ohio--the one that said there was no evidence of outright fraud AT THAT TIME.
No one sat around--there was a huge amount of investigation--and much has come to light over time.
I understand that, had they been able to get anyone to come forward with proof, they would have called for an investigation before the vote was certified in January.
I also understand that John Kerry has supported the investigation of all legitimate concerns about the 2004 elections. He knows what happened.
There were, apparently, three lawsuits in Ohio. The one that PDA is asking people to complain about is the first--the Badnarik-Green lawsuit. It is not a strong case. Lawyers have advised that this one is not winnable.
There are TWO MORE LAWSUITS and THEY are going forward. The second and third lawsuits are, according to my sources, based more on the civil rights issues and Kerry-Edwards are indeed part of these suits.
It is also my understanding that more evidence has come out, and perhaps, some testimonials from observers within the state, with evidence. Ohio is not over. And John Kerry has not stopped fighting.
He never has and he won't. He is a quiet warrior, but he is a warrior.
You can take that to the bank--
http://www.democracycellproject.net/blog/archives/2005/08/a_mothers_dream.html