Critical Iraq passage in Froomkin today

[TayTay]

I don't have a lot of time to post, but I wanted folks to see this. It is my contention that the US will not be in Iraq in anything like the way we are in a year. This is because the Bushies will weasel us into some other sinister arrangement. They are not giving up, they are changing tactics. Anyway READ THIS:

Froomkin

The Talabani Visit

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim VandeHei writes in The Washington Post: "Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said in an interview yesterday that the United States could withdraw as many as 50,000 troops by the end of the year, declaring there are enough Iraqi forces trained and ready to begin assuming control in cities throughout the country.

"After the White House and Pentagon were contacted for comment, however, a senior adviser to Talabani called The Washington Post to say Talabani did not intend to suggest a specific timeline for withdrawal. 'He is afraid . . . this might put the notion of a timetable on this thing,' the adviser said. 'The exact figure of what would be required will undeniably depend on the level of insurgency the level of Iraqi capability.'

"In the interview, Talabani said he planned to discuss reductions in U.S. forces during a private meeting with President Bush today, and said he believed the United States could begin pulling out some troops immediately."

Bush has insisted that timetables would only embolden the enemy.

VandeHei writes: "Talabani's statement has the potential to put Bush in a difficult position if the troops are not pulled out by year's end, since critics are certain to ask why U.S. soldiers cannot come home when Iraq's own president says they can. The two leaders will hold a joint news conference today after their meeting."

And in the latest Gallup Poll, 41 percent of those polled support an immediate and total withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

Mark Hosenball writes in Newsweek: "Analysts at the Defense Intelligence Agency have begun war-gaming scenarios for what might happen in Iraq if U.S. force levels were cut back or eliminated, say counterterrorism and defense sources. The officials, who asked not to be named because of the sensitive subject matter, declined to discuss specifics of the DIA analyses, which they indicate are in the preliminary stages. Some officials say that people in the intelligence community are leery about engaging in speculative exercises for fear of being accused by conservatives of undermining George W. Bush's administration policy. However, others say that this analysis could support staying the course in Iraq if a U.S. pullout would result in greater insurgent violence or a religious civil war."