Kerry calls for the creation of an independent IG to investigate ethics

[Mass]

violation (from the Congressional report today).

This does not surprise me at all. And we begin to see the enforcement mechanisms that were missing from the other bills.

Mr. KERRY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs:

S. Con. Res. 82

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS OFFICER.

(a) Establishment.--There is established in the legislative branch an independent authority to be known as the Congressional Ethics Office to be headed by a Congressional Ethics Officer.
...

Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, today I am submitting a concurrent resolution establishing an independent Congressional Inspector General to investigate ethics violations in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Every Member of Congress must be held to the highest ethical standards. Those who violate the public trust must be held accountable for their actions. Unfortunately, our current system does not measure up. Too often, Congress has been unable or unwilling to effectively investigate or appropriately punish those Members who commit serious ethical violations.

In December 2005, an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll showed that just five percent of Americans believe all Members of Congress are honest and trustworthy. The same poll showed that most Americans believe that most Members of Congress are dishonest and are not trustworthy.

This is simply unacceptable. We have to restore the faith of the American people in the Congress. Thus, I am submitting a resolution to establish an independent Congressional Inspector General with the authority to investigate and punish violations of the ethics rules by Members of Congress, Congressional staff and the Capitol Police.

The Congressional Inspector General will make a preliminary investigation into all ethical misconduct allegations to determine whether there is probable cause that a full investigation is warranted. The Congressional Inspector General has expansive authority to investigate ethics allegations, including improper conduct that may reflect upon the Senate or House of Representatives, significant violations of law, violations of the Senate Code of Official Conduct or the ethics rules of the House of Representatives, and violations of Congressional rules or regulations relating to the conduct of Members in their performance of official duties. If a full investigation is warranted, a public report will be developed for the House and Senate Ethics Committees or the Justice Department describing any credible evidence of improper conduct or a violation of law.

To insure that this new ethics process is not abused, anyone who knowingly files a false ethics complaint will be subject to a $10,000 fine or the costs incurred by the investigation, whichever is greater. They could also be subject to up to one year in prison and will be banned from making further complaints.

The Congressional Inspector General will not be able to accept new charges filed 30 days prior to a primary election for which the Member of Congress in question is a candidate or 60 days prior to a general election for which the Member of Congress is a candidate.

The Congressional Inspector General will also provide periodic reports to Congress on how to update our ethics laws and how to improve the investigation and enforcement of current ethics laws. Finally, it would release an annual report of violations by Members of Congress and Congressional staff.

I also strongly support other legislation to develop independent oversight of the Congressional ethics process including the Congressional Ethics Enforcement Commission Act of 2006 that was introduced by Senator Obama earlier this year. I look forward to working with my colleagues to develop ethics reform legislation in the upcoming months.

We need to change the way business is done in Washington. We must convince the American people that our government responds to the needs of our people, not to special interests. This resolution will help restore the faith of the American people in their government. Together we can work to change our government for the better.

He is also co-sponsoring Obama's bill on the same issue.

S. 2259

At the request of Mr. OBAMA, the name of the Senator from Massachusetts (Mr. KERRY) was added as a cosponsor of S. 2259, a bill to establish an Office of Public Integrity in the Congress and a Congressional Ethics Enforcement Commission.

[karynnj]

1. This really sounds like a good idea

He and/or his staff seem like they really tried to anticipate the abuses that could occur. (I'm surprised that he has such a short period before an election - is 30 days long enough to reject false complaints? Even with the penalties, you could picture a SBVT type creep filing fake charges 31 days before. They would be punished afterwards, but they may have caused the candidate to lose.)

[whometense]

2. Paul Kiel on TPM has

this:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007760.php

The Democrats want to run as the party of reform? Then they can't afford days like today.

Today, the Senate Rules Committee voted on two different reform proposals. One was the Democrats' Honest Leadership and Open Government Act; the other was an earmark and lobbying reform bill by Sen. Lott (R-MS). The Democrats' bill went down on party lines, 10-8. Lott's bill passed unanimously. In other words, in one short committee meeting, the Republicans completely co-opted the issue...

...Well, Sen. Obama (D-IL) sent out a "Dear Colleague" letter February 10th (read the letter here). The response? As today's Hill reports, it's been...underwhelming. As of yesterday, he had one co-sponsor, Sen. Reid (D-NV). Today, according to Sen. Obama's office, he added Sen. Kerry (D-MA). So that's two - not very impressive support. Why? As The Hill puts it: "lawmakers appear to view the medicine as too strong."

[karynnj]

3. I can't believe that Obama has only 2 co-sponsors

So, I guess that the majority of Democrats and Republicans don't really want things really cleaned up. I'm glad Kerry is still fighting for this. i think it would be great if he reintroduced a new version of his clean election bill in memory of Wellstone. It's interesting how some jump on and off the wagon on this, while Kerry has been consistent from the beginning.

[TayTay]

4. I can't believe this!

I should think that Bayh, Clinton and Feingold at least would jump on this. It makes no sense. Don't these peope want to run 'for' anything?

[karynnj]

5. I don't know - I wonder the most about Feingold who should sign this.

I wonder how many signatures Kerry will get.

None of them signed Kerry's DSM memo either - which is just as bad. So, I guess they don't really want accountability.

[wisteria]

7. I don't think so, they are more interested in raising as much money

as possible for their runs. The money is necessary, to a point, however, it will only get you noticed. You actually need to say or represent something people will get excited about and remember.

[TayTay]

8. What a terrible short-sightedness

There is a 'culture of corruption' but the Dems don't care? Sigh! What a wasted opportunity. (I can just hear this as a Dem debate question sometime next year: What did you do about corruption?)

[FreedomAngel82]

6. This is good news!

I'm glad to hear this!

[ProSense]

9. Great stuff!

I'd love to see the Democrats back Kerry's campaign finance reform bill too.

[kerrygoddess]

10. Press release

http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=2099

[ProSense]

11. They're trying to push McCain again

Senate Considers Independent Ethics Office
By JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press Writer
27 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - An independent ethics office is included in a lobbying reform package a Senate committee is taking up, putting on the table the sensitive issue of whether lawmakers are capable of policing themselves.

Snip...

There's little controversy over many aspects of the bill — based on a measure sponsored by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Joe Lieberman, D-Conn. — such as banning gifts and travel provided by lobbyists.


Snip...


The idea of an independent ethics office is being pushed by lawmakers, led by Democrats, who say the current system isn't capable of handling ethics issues in a fair and timely fashion. The House ethics committee has been inactive for more than a year, crippled by partisan differences over investigations and staffing.

House and Senate Democrats have a bill that would create an office with auditing and investigative authority. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has proposed an ethics enforcement commission to receive complaints from the public on alleged ethics violations by lawmakers. Reps. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., and Marty Meehan, D-Mass., partners on campaign finance reform, have a similar proposal.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060302/ap_on_go_co/congress_ethics_2

Kerry gets no mention, but the article is about an effort "led by Democrats."