|
Edited on Sat Jun-27-09 06:38 PM by Joe Chi Minh
Christ was true Man as well as true God; that he learned in the same experiential way that we do, as well as by suffering. Of course, since he did not, himself, inherit the effects of original sin, he would have been a very much more apt pupil than we are. He would have become increasingly aware of his true nature as the Son of God as he grew older.
Nevertheless, because, as the Second Person of the Trinity, Christ had evidently preternaturally, before time began, chosen to become incarnate, taking on our full human nature, at least in its pristine state, it meant he accepted an appropriate limitation on his human knowledge and understanding of earthly matters, so that he was frequently non-plussed by what seemed to him the slow-wittedness of his disciples; and it led to quite a few humorous situations, as did the extent of his miraculous powers when witnessed by them.
The French writer, Sartre, once wrote, "Hell is other people", since we are social creatures. And if you reflect on Christ's offering himself to be whipped and crucified, the most humiliating of deaths, you have to wonder how Mary managed to stay by him at the foot of the cross, and not go insane; even granted that she, too, via Christ's prevenient, redemptive grace, her Immaculate Conception, was spared the effects of Original Sin. It is believed that Joseph was much older than Mary and had died by that time, and I suspect that, one way or another, it would have been too much for his health, physical or mental, so it might have been fortunate in that regard.
The hardest thing of all for Jesus, himself, Mary and the Apostles, must have been the knowledge that his executors and persecutors, failing to understand that, throughout the three long hours of his crucifixion, they had no power over him that he had not, himself, given to them, were gloating and taunting him mercilessly. Is there any other form of execution that could have so invited their gloating? So forcefully expressed the total power of Christ's executioners over him, who could not so much as move a foot or hand.
Since Mary was physically at his side, as well as closer to him emotionally than anyone else, she must have experienced much of the shame and pain, both on her own behalf and as his mother. Christ, Mary and the disciples must have represented a kind of cone of the most intense and humiliating suffering. He, who taught that even thinking lustfully of a women was adulterous, would have hung naked on the cross, and who would have been more aware that he was innocent as a four year-old child than his mother. Their culture with regard to nakedness would have been akin to that of the Iraqi victims of Abu Ghraib and the other torture sites.
On the subject of our being social creatures, it is a matter of common observation that it, if anything, it holds even more true in respect of women than of men. So we can expect Mary to have had the same urge for acceptance and respect, if not respectability - as most other women, tend to; and all the more keenly living in a rural community. So, the latin words, "Stabat mater...", (the mother was standing) have a particulary profound significance for Catholics, who, traditionally, like the Jews, themselves, have been very family-oriented. The Incarnation is pivotal to our humanity, of our membership of a society, part of the family of mankind. And, of course, Mary played the key role in the birth and raising of Christ in his humanity.
Ultimately, if a person so wishes, they can put forward reasons for not attaching much significance to Mary's role in the Gospels, but if you can see it, it's at least as a result to by supernatural prompting. "Mother Mary speaks to me..., etc.
|