|
My, you certainly have a good grasp of the scholarly aspects of reading the Bible.
I would say I read both Testaments as Rhetorical Criticism, but the little study I've done tends to cover the history of the writings, with the aim of aiding me in how to approach it.
The Old Testament in particular I view mostly as literature with a message. I do love Isaiah in particular, to me he is sheer poetry, and paints the most wonderful word pictures. Because so much of his writing relates to the events of the New Testament, he seems a bit more relevant to me than many others. And of course the Psalms of David are magic, the most beautiful testimony of man's faith ever written I think. I just take them as that.
I take the New Testament mostly as a whole series of parables - I read the message at face value, but I know that we really don't have any clear idea of just who Jesus was, or what parts of his story were written by whom, or when they were written. I base my faith on the gospel message, but not on the literal facts, because there are so many contradictions between the various gospels.
I'm not sure where that leaves me in scholarly terms!
|