The basic assumption of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is that one's thoughts influence one's emotions and behaviors, and that if negative thoughts are altered, negative emotions and behaviors will be altered, as well.
CBT's earliest originators were behaviorists, Pavlov,(That is the Pavlov's who conditioned responses in dogs to drool by the ring of a bell) Watson, Skinner,(Wrote In Beyond Freedom and Dignity, Skinner put forth the notion that Man had no indwelling personality, nor will, intention, self-determinism or personal responsibility, and that modern concepts of freedom and dignity have to fall away so Man could be intelligently controlled to behave as he should. Despite the fact of the degree of implied human degradation. I think Skinner was a fucking monster he abused his child) and Eysenck, to name a few, who paved the way for the behavioral treatment of mental disorders.
Behavioral therapy is as useful as new age crap like "the secret" is, it was a resounding FAILURE for me.I hated it.Some of us cannot fake it long enough to even begin to look like we "made it".
The book Beyond Freedom and Dignity was written under a grant from the National Institutes of Mental Health (HIMH). This shows first, the relation of the government to behavioral engineering, and second, that even this massive government organization which claims to deal with "mental health" is quite comfortable dealing with theorists who blatantly deny the very existence of a mind and therefore anything "mental". Possible the NIMH should change it's name to something more appropriate, such as the "National Institutes of Human Control and Conditioning" - which would be a more apt name for what they are actually concerned with.
http://www.sntp.net/behaviorism/skinner.htm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Psychiatry seems nervous about trusting itself to this process. It is 50 years since the first randomised controlled trial in medicine, and doctors in other specialties seem sufficiently comfortable with the method to form research practice consortia and to conduct mega-trials 1 2 that are comparatively immune to the methodological and political hazards that can beset small randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses. 3 4 Why, then, have mega-trials not begun in psychiatry? There are two important reasons: the types of treatment used, and the nature of the endpoints. Psychological treatments can be effective and, in certain disorders, more effective than drugs.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/319/7209/562http://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/53/5/632-aImagine a doctor wearing the traditionally authoritative white coat walking into the local asylum with a baseball bat. He finds a couple of hyperactive patient-residents, clobbers them over the head with the bat and notices that they grow noticeably calmer when unconscious. The company that makes the bats funds the doctor's subsequent research (which of course corroborates the earlier findings) and the bat is marketed to other psychiatrists as a "mood stabilizer."
- Gary C. Marfin from Sugar Land, Texas