Real world shots taken with the Fujifilm X100. Scroll down

[alfredo]

the page and check out the images. The text is Google Translate, so expect the unexpected: "I can leave the charger at home or autonomy is a fair bit."

This is from a pre production camera.
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.quesabesde.com%2Fnoticias%2Ffuji-x100-muestras-analisis%2C1_7322

[Stevenmarc]

1. OK the iso 12,800 shot was pretty damn good

But I can't wait to see a side by side with the Leica X1

[alfredo]

2. Yeah. I saw an X1 yesterday. Looks real solid. There was an

M9 next to it.

It appears that the X100 will have faster AF than the X1. From what I saw, the X100 will probably satisfy all but the pickiest pixel peepers. I saw little, if any, noise in the dark areas.

Right now I am debating Sony NEX or Olympus E-Pl2. I read that the Olympus camera division is losing money, but the other divisions are more than making up for it. Still, I hope they don't drop or sell it to some company that doesn't share their high line QC and design team. I'd consider Samsung NX10 or NX11 if they dealt with the high ISO noise issue. At the speeds I shoot, it may not be an issue because I see little need for anything over ISO 400. I do like the larger sensor on the Sony and Samsung.

[alfredo]

3. Here is a side by side, but not image samples, only hardware.

http://leicarumors.com/2011/02/15/fuji-x100-vs-leica-x1-specs-comparison.aspx/