|
I'm having a debate with a friend and need some help.
As part of my backyard makeover, I'm building an attached pergola to cover my tiled porch. The construction method being used for the pergola is fairly simple: I'm placing a pair of pressure treated 4x4 uprights at the outer edge of the patio, with two 2x6's running between them (i.e. the four by's will have one 2x6 at the top on the yard side, and another 2x6 on the house side, sandwiching the tops of the 4x4's between the 2x6's). This structure will then be attached to the house by six additional 2x6's running between the outer wall of the house and the inner 2x6 on the outer support structure.
Here's my issue: My tiled porch is 17 feet long. Assuming that my 4x4's are placed a foot in from the edges, I'll end up with a 15 foot unsupported span between them. I believe that the structure will work...since it carries no load the 2x6's only have to carry their own weight and a portion of the weight from the attached crossbeams, we shouldn't be anywhere near the failure point of the wood. To test my belief, I went to Lowes yesterday and picked up the end of a 20' 2x6. That 2x6 supported its own weight without any sagging issues.
My friend, on the other hand, thinks the 15 foot span is too long and insists that it will cone crashing down the first time the wind blows. He wants me to add another support pillar in the middle, which will ruin the view out of my living rooms picture window.
So who's right?
|