http://xml-na.amznxslt.com/onca/xml3?&dev-t=D1SSWIYLUA3R8B&t=americamag10-20&AsinSearch=0674932617&type=heavy&f=http://www.americamagazine.org/asin-to-html-10-20.xsl<snip>
The last chapter is the most provocative, where Reese suggests reforms that are both logical and unrealistic: He argues that Vatican administrators should not be allowed to become cardinals, which in papal elections would cause a monumental power shift toward those who are in closer touch with the laity. Reese suggests priests play a major role in selecting bishops, as was the case before the 1800s, in contrast to the current practice in which the pope appoints ultraconservative bishops who can't relate to anyone in their diocese.
According to Reese, the underlying problem is that the Vatican is more interested in doctrinal purity than keeping people in the church. Meanwhile the laity are voting with their feet, gravitating to pastors who ignore papal instructions, or leaving the church altogether.
<snip>
Is this the revenge of the Insiders?