|
I liked 'em, generally, but found their disdain of Christianity a bit much. Like the guy who told me "You're too bright to be a Christian", and thought he'd paid me a compliment.
In terms of beliefs, they're a merger of two traditions (like every mainline Protestant church). The Unitarians tended toward humanism, with an interesting mix of agnostics and atheists. The main thing they had in common was rejection of the Trinity--which could mean anything from rejection of a god at all to believing in God, but seeing Jesus as a good teacher, not the Messiah.
The Universalists were Christians who rejected the doctrine of election, and ultimately the idea of hell. The original Universalists believed Jesus' death and resurrection was salvific for everyone. There are few such traditional Universalists in the UUA today, but some.
Put succinctly, Unitarians believed humas were too good to go to Hell. Universalists believed God was to good to send us there.
The two groups merged in the early 60's (when everyone else was doing it, too!). They now incorporate a wide range of beliefs. There's a UU Humanist organization, UU Buddhists, UU Christians, a Jewish group, and the Covenant of UU Pagans, among others. They get annoyed when you say UU's can believe anything. But I think it's safe to say UUs can believe anything that affirms some basic ethics and aesthetics. Or, as a friend put it, you can't be a good Nazi and a good UU.
They tend to be very intellectual and upper middle class. Very common in college towns. In industrial, working class communities, or rural areas, not so much.
They do have a set of Priniciples and Purposes to give them a common mission. And a set of Sources and Traditions, or some such, that affirms most religious traditions as being within UU beliefs.
|