"Conservative activists came to Washington to do good and stayed to do well,"
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/29/politics/29assess.htmlSeptember 29, 2005
For G.O.P., DeLay Indictment Adds to a Sea of Troubles
By ROBIN TONER
WASHINGTON, Sept. 28 - <snip>Moreover, the string of ethical issues so close together - including the indictment and continuing investigation of the Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who was close to Mr. DeLay, and the arrest of David H. Safavian, a former White House budget official who was charged with lying to investigators and obstructing a federal inquiry involving Mr. Abramoff - is a source of anxiety in Republican circles.
<snip>
At the same time, the White House is grappling with a criminal investigation into whether anyone leaked the name of a C.I.A. operative, an inquiry that has brought both Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's top political adviser, and I. Lewis Libby, chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, before a grand jury.
And the administration is struggling to steady itself after the slow response to Hurricane Katrina and defend itself against sweeping accusations of incompetence and cronyism in domestic security.
<snip>
Whether Democrats will be able to make that case is another question; they have internal problems of their own, notably their chronic problem in unifying around a clear message , a challenge the Republicans met with the Contract With America.
<snip>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/28/AR2005092802550.htmlPer the Post's Murray/VandeHei - Blunt, even more than DeLay, has "created a formal alliance with K Street lobbyists, empowering corporate representatives and trade association executives to assist the House leadership in counting votes and negotiating amendments to bring holdouts into the fold
http://www.oregonlive.com/newsflash/washingtonstate/index.ssf?/base/politics-7/1127980443158381.xml&storylist=washington"Even as DeLay professed his innocence and his lawyers said they hoped to avoid having him handcuffed, fingerprinted and photographed, potential for fresh controversy surfaced."
"Records on file with the Federal Election Commission show that Blunt's political action committee has paid roughly $88,000 in fees since 2003 to a consultant facing indictment in Texas in the same case as DeLay."
"Keri Ann Hayes, executive director of the Rely on Your Beliefs Fund, said officials of the organization have not discussed whether to end the relationship with the consultant, Jim Ellis, in light of his indictment."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-09-29-blunt-approach_x.htmBlunt known for low-key approach
WASHINGTON (AP) — <snip>But Blunt has also been the target of ethics charges arising from his relationship with two lobbyists — his wife and his other son, Andrew.
In 2002, he helped secure an amendment into a spending bill for the Iraq war that benefited United Parcel Service and FedEx Corp. Andrew Blunt is a lobbyist for UPS in Jefferson City, Mo.
Rep. Blunt also tried to help tobacco giant Philip Morris in the 2002 homeland security bill by amending the measure to stop the smuggling of contraband cigarettes. At the same time, Blunt had a personal relationship with a lobbyist for the company, Abigail Perlman. Blunt divorced his wife of 35 years and married Perlman in 2003.
Blunt has denied any undue influence and says neither his son nor Perlman ever lobbied him on the issues.