Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court denies FBI translator's (Sibel Edmonds- Bush knew?) case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Democrats Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 11:27 AM
Original message
Supreme Court denies FBI translator's (Sibel Edmonds- Bush knew?) case
"Closing cases that involve allegations of government wrongdoing ... fosters public doubts about the private justice that certain people and entities get in the public courts, harms public debate about the issues involved ... and perhaps most devastatingly, fosters an appearance of unfairness that the government can close off access to the public courts when it is under fire," the media lawyers said in a friend-of-the-court filing.


http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/13275333.htm

Posted on Mon, Nov. 28, 2005


Supreme Court denies FBI translator's (Sibel Edmonds- Bush knew?) case

TONI LOCY

Associated Press


WASHINGTON - A former FBI translator failed Monday to persuade the Supreme Court to revive her lawsuit alleging she was fired for reporting possible wrongdoing by other linguists involved in counterterrorism investigations.

The high court also rebuffed a request by Sibel Edmonds and media groups to rule on whether an appellate court improperly held arguments in the case in secret without being asked to do so by either side.

"When courts are sealed, the public may suspect the worst and lose faith in their government simply because they are prohibited access," wrote lawyers for media groups, including The Associated Press.

Edmonds, 32, who was hired after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and fired in March 2002, argued that a trial court judge was wrong to accept the Justice Department's claim that allowing her lawsuit to go forward would threaten "state secrets," or national security.<snip>





Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. this just reinforces the fact that BushCo owns all three branches . . .
of the US government . . . and they're not about to let go . . .

and as long as we have e-voting, they'll keep "winning" elections and remain in power . . .

"so sayeth the flock" . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Democrats Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC