MORE ON THE CUSTOMS COMIC BOOK SEIZURE
Writing for the Charleston City Paper, Jason Zwiker reported on the recent seizure of the Stripburger anthology by US Customs. While no new developments were reported (and as of press time, there has been no new action in the case, according to the CBLDF), Zwiker’s article does quote Richie Bush creator Peter Kuper as saying that his comic “Is a clear case of parody both of the Harvey comics characters and the current administration. I have never earned a dime from this parody and in fact had a number of out-of-pocket expenses. The purpose of this parody was to cast a light on the Bush administration’s policies and have a hearty laugh along the way. Lord knows, in times like these we could all use a good laugh.”
Zwiker also checks in with Charleston attorney Edward Fenno, who points out aspects of the case in regards to parody and fair use. Fenno is quoted as saying: “to be a protected against a copyright infringement claim, the author of a parody should at least loosely target the original (in this instance the Richie Rich comics) not just provide commentary on some other social issue by using the style and creativity of the original.”
The article also points out the 1997 case of The Cat NOT in the Hat, which was produced in the style of Dr. Suess’ works, but parodied the O.J. Simpson trial. In that case, a court found that the author of the work did not parody Suess’ style, but merely used the look and cadence of Dr. Suess’ works to get attention.
In that instance, when a copyrighted property is used to poke fun at another target, Fenno told Zwiker that the overall work then “receives less protection against copyright claims than parody. Satire can stand on its own two feet and so requires more justification for the act of borrowing” from the original copyrighted work, according to Judge O’Scannlain in his Dr. Seuss court opinion. Forsythe’s Food Chain Barbie photos were protected because they were ruled to not only critique objectification of women, but also to critique the Barbie doll as a propagator of that objectification.”
More:
http://newsarama.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=23469