Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill to ban insider trading in Congress is suddenly popular

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Congress Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:06 PM
Original message
Bill to ban insider trading in Congress is suddenly popular
For six years, Rep. Louise M. Slaughter pressed her colleagues to co-sponsor legislation that would ban them from using information they gleaned on Capitol Hill to guide their trades in the stock market.

Most lawmakers bristled, offended by the mere suggestion that they would ever engage in such behavior. Others politely listened but walked away — some as recently as last month. Slaughter (D-N.Y.) never expected to hear from them again.

But now, as the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee prepares to hold the first of two congressional hearings on the topic, Slaughter’s Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act has become an overnight sensation.

Slaughter has 127 co-sponsors, up from the nine she had on Nov. 12, the day before “60 Minutes” aired a piece highlighting investments that congressional leaders made in companies while legislative efforts were underway that may have affected stock values. The piece was based on “Throw Them All Out,” a book released last month by Hoover Institution fellow Peter Schweizer.

full: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bill-to-ban-insider-trading-in-congress-is-suddenly-popular/2011/11/30/gIQAn193DO_singlePage.html
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anything to keep their phony baloney jobs.
So if no one would *ever* engage in such behaviour, then why notjust codify it and be done with it?

/cough
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
johnb72341js Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-11 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Marie Marie Donating Member (709 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Christ - this should be a no brainer.
It's so unethical it stinks to high Heaven. Make it illegal so they at least have to break the law (which will never be enforced) to continue to cash in on their abuse of power. I guess that Martha Stewart was their (wink wink) token example of enforcement on this often ignored law for the rest of the new millennium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Congress Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC