|
And the nuclear policy question... that's "nu-cle-ar", not "nu-cu-lar"... anyone else get the impression she didn't even understand the question so she just substituted the only answer she knew that had the word "nuclear" in it? Which probably wouldn't have looked so bad if Biden hadn't come right back and provided a cogent answer to the question.
Answer after answer, I got the impression that she was trying to burn time by padding her responses with two or three sentences of meaningless preface before launching into an irrelevant talking-point answer. Not sure if she was playing for time while her brain searched for which canned response to give or if she was trying to fill time so she wouldn't come up short and therefore risk being asked a followup question, but all of her answers made me think of a fifth grader padding a book report to get it up to the minimum required length.
Palin's performance tonight coupled with the Couric interviews and her inability to bring up the Supreme Court decision in re the Exxon Valdez reminded me strongly of people I knew in college who would cram for exams and immediately forget the material they'd temporarily memorized. I don't think they actually learned much and neither, apparently, has she. Not what I want in an executive. Biden, on the other hand, actually answered the questions and seemed to be drawing comfortably from a deep store of knowledge. He understood the answers he was giving. I'm not convinced that she did, and rather suspect that she didn't, which makes her desire for enhanced VP powers profoundly disturbing.
|